The first thing, and likely the most important thing, is that Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney seem to be sincere. It is hard to be absolutely certain, of course: they are both actors, after all, and a 45-minute Zoom meeting is, on balance, probably not the ideal format in which to take the measure of someone’s soul.
If their enthusiasm and affection for Wrexham, the down-at-the-heels team they bought two years ago – and the community that it calls home – is an act, though, then it is a convincing one. McElhenney watches Wrexham’s games these days, while “pacing back and forth, unable to sit still”, he said. “There is nothing quite like the anxiety soccer produces.”
If anything, he has got off lightly compared to Reynolds. McElhenney is a lifelong Philadelphia Eagles fan, a blessing and a curse that served to inoculate him – to some extent – against the ravages of fandom even as he fell quickly, “deeply and madly in love” with Wrexham.
Reynolds, on the other hand, was pure, unsullied, defenceless. He had nurtured something of a soft spot for the Vancouver Canucks and Whitecaps, his hometown hockey and soccer teams, but admitted he would be stretching it to identify as a fan.
The top 25 women’s sporting moments of the year: top spot revealed with Katie Taylor, Rhasidat Adeleke and Kellie Harrington featuring
Irish WWE star Lyra Valkyria: ‘At its core, we’re storytellers. Everything comes down to good versus evil’
Ken Early on World Cup draw: Ireland face task to overcome Hungary, their football opposites
Is there anything good about the 2034 World Cup going to Saudi Arabia?
At first, he wondered if he was resistant to the sensation. He caught only half of Wrexham’s first few games after his and McElhenney’s takeover was completed in February 2021. He was, by his own admission, “pretty passive”. It did not last. When it hit him, it him hard.
“It is a horrible, cyclical, prophetic hellscape that never ceases or ebbs,” he said, a sentence that suggests he has come to fully understand the appeal of soccer. “I love every second, but it’s torment in equal measure. Every second is pure agony. It’s a new experience for me. I am in awe of people who have survived in that culture their whole lives.”
Neither McElhenney or Reynolds had quite anticipated the extent of the emotional impact when, late in 2020, the former approached the latter with a proposal. McElhenney had spent a considerable portion of lockdown watching sports documentaries: the acclaimed Sunderland ‘Til I Die, for one, and more significantly a HBO series on Diego Maradona. He decided he wanted to add his own production to the canon, and he wanted Reynolds – an acquaintance, rather than a friend, at that stage – to help bankroll it.
The result, Welcome To Wrexham, is heart-warming and funny and appealing, but it is also difficult to categorise. At one point, Reynolds describes it – perhaps as a slip of the tongue – as a “reality show”, but that feels reductive. So, too, does the faintly euphemistic term “structured reality”, a genre most recently characterised by Netflix’s glossy Selling Sunset.
But nor is it, strictly speaking, a documentary, not in the traditional sense, not in the way that Sunderland ‘Til I Die was a documentary. There is a long-held rule among wildlife photographers and documentarians that they are present to observe, rather than intervene. Even David Attenborough hews to the mantra that “tragedy is part of life”. To prevent it, he said, would be “to distort the truth”.
Welcome To Wrexham, by contrast, is inherently interventionist. Wrexham had been drifting, hopeless and forlorn, in English soccer’s fifth tier for more than a decade when it was bought, out of the blue, by two Hollywood stars. Reynolds and McElhenney are the dei ex machina. They are not simply telling a story. They are shaping it, too.
That is exemplified, most clearly, by what appears to be an innocuous jump cut halfway through the show’s second episode. All of a sudden, the viewer is at home with Paul Rutherford, Wrexham’s locally born veteran midfielder. With more than a hint of pride, Rutherford shows off all the work he and his wife, Gemma, have done to their home: they put in the staircase, lowered the ceilings, installed a downstairs bathroom.
It turns out the house is about to get a little busier. The couple already have two boys; a third is on the way. Rutherford is currently building the baby’s crib. Later, he is shown playing soccer with his eldest son. He carries him home on his shoulders. It is heart-warming, touching and deeply ominous.
Anyone who has seen a nature documentary in which a young giraffe becomes separated from the herd, or a horror movie in which a teenager experiences a power cut, or an instalment of Match of the Day in which a player is shown picking up an innocuous early yellow card, knows the cue. Something bad is about to happen.
The bad, in this case, comes in Wrexham’s last game of the season, a few months after the takeover. The team need to win to make the playoffs. Rutherford, introduced as a substitute, is sent off for a reckless challenge. He is shown in the changing room, his chest heaving, urging his team-mates to win without him. They do not. Wrexham are held to a draw. Their season is over. A caption appears. Rutherford’s contract expired the next day. He was released. He was the giraffe.
Such is the cold reality of soccer, of course, a sport that has no appetite for sentiment and – at the level Wrexham occupied – no money for it, either. Countless players suffer the same fate as Rutherford every season, victims of the game’s quotidian, unapologetic mercilessness. His story, apart perhaps from the circumstances of his farewell, is not especially remarkable.
Reynolds and McElhenney are clear that, while they are ultimately responsible for it, they did not make that call. Personnel decisions are left to those on the ground at Wrexham, those who know the sport far better than they do. Nobody is hired or fired because it makes good drama; their commitment, Reynolds said, is simply to do the best by Wrexham as an entity.
Sometimes, sadly, that means individuals have to be cast as collateral. They take no pleasure in that. “It is a terrible feeling,” Reynolds said. “You don’t want to mess with people’s livelihoods. It’s genuinely awful. It feels mercenary, but it’s also part of our responsibility to the club.”
It is impossible not to feel, though, that their very presence placed a thumb on the scale. Of course, Rutherford – and the other players who were cut – might have been released by a different ownership group. Reynolds and McElhenney’s vision and ambition, though, made it certain. They are not simply telling the story. They are writing it, too.
McElhenney, certainly, is aware of the irony. Sports are compelling, he said, because they are “uncontrived”, authentic. “Any piece of scripted content has been contrived and created and manipulated to make you feel a certain way,” he said. “The masters can do that to great effect; they can make you feel like you’re not being manipulated, but that is the intent. There is no manipulation in sports. What is happening is what is happening.”
By documenting that, though, they are necessarily adding a layer of manipulation. Any documentary, McElhenney said, has to take a “point of view”, to tease out a narrative thread from thousands of unhelpfully unstructured and often inchoate real-life moments for viewers to consume.
“Sports are kind of meaningless to me unless I know what is at stake for someone,” Reynolds said. “What a player overcame to be there. What a club means to a community. If I think about the movies that made an impression on me, is Field of Dreams a movie about baseball? Not really. It’s a movie about a father and son trying to connect. That context is what pulls you in.”
It is a tension that more and more clubs will confront as the lines between sport and story blur ever further. There are ever more documentaries in production – Amazon’s All Or Nothing series will follow the German national team at this year’s World Cup – as soccer embraces the same logic as Formula 1 and Drive To Survive: what happens on the field is not the only thing that can be harnessed to drive interest and, as a result, revenue.
At heart, of course, what Reynolds and McElhenney have done with Wrexham is an inherently benign form of ownership, certainly by soccer’s standards. They have not saddled the club with debt. They are not using it to try to whitewash the image of a repressive state. They have given a club, and a town, reason to believe, and all for the price of a couple of camera crews.
Their ownership does not, they insist, hinge on Welcome To Wrexham being a success. They are in it “for the long haul”, Reynolds said, whether the audience is or not. They have, of course, already affected the story of the team, and quite possibly the town, too. But they are not mere observers. They are in the story, too, and so the team, and the town, have done exactly the same to them.
– This article originally appeared in the New York Times
