Buckingham Palace has issued a second denial that the Duke of York had sexual contact with a woman who claims she was forced to have sex with him when she was under age.
It comes after several Sunday newspapers published comments by the woman and identified her as the woman who reportedly named Andrew in US court documents related to a convicted paedophile.
The palace initially said “any suggestion of impropriety with under-age minors” by the Duke was “categorically untrue”.
In a second strongly worded statement last night, a Buckingham Palace spokesman said:
“It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with (the woman who has made the claim).”
“The allegations made are false and without any foundation.”
The woman, a US citizen, waived her anonymity in an interview with the Mail on Sunday in 2011, in which she claimed she had been sexually exploited by American billionaire and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — a former friend of the Duke.
Prince Andrew was photographed with Mr Epstein in New York two years after the American’s release from prison in 2009 and their friendship was a source of controversy.
In the US court papers, the woman claims that between 1999 and 2002 she “was forced to have sexual relations with this prince when she was a minor” in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Mr Epstein.
The accusation is reportedly contained in a motion filed in a Florida court this week, which is part of a lawsuit over how federal prosecutors handled the case of Mr Epstein, who was jailed for 18 months in 2008 for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
The Mail on Sunday and the Sunday Mirror have since published details of interviews given by the woman in recent years, in which she discusses three alleged encounters with the Duke.
Prince Andrew is believed to have been on a ski trip in Verbier, Switzerland, as the latest reports of the controversy broke.
A royal source confirmed the Duke had been on a private holiday abroad.
It is understood that despite the controversy, he is planning to attend the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, later this month.
In the court papers, Mr Epstein is accused of repeatedly abusing the woman — now said to be in her 30s — on his private jet and luxury homes in New York, New Mexico, Florida and the US Virgin Islands.
The court document says: "Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe (a name used in US legal proceedings for people with anonymity), making her available for sex to politically connected and financially powerful people.
“Epstein’s purposes in ‘lending’ Jane Doe (along with other young girls) to such powerful people were to ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information.”
It adds: “For instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe 3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British royal family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).”
Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz — who is also named in the court papers — said the claims against him were part of a pattern of “made-up stories” against prominent people.
Prof Dershowitz, who represented Mr Epstein in the 2008 case, said he would not rest until he had shown that the claims regarding his conduct were false and he advised the Duke to do everything in his power to clear his name.
In June 2011 it was announced that Prince Andrew was stepping down from his role as the UK’s roving business ambassador.
Prince Andrew gave up the post following the intense scrutiny he faced over his relationships with Mr Epstein and other controversial figures.
Meanwhile, Ghislaine Maxwell, an associate of Mr Epstein, has branded claims made against her as "untrue" and "obvious lies" after she was reportedly named in the US court papers.
Ms Maxwell, daughter of late newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell, has previously denied any wrongdoing and said in 2011 she would take legal action over some of the reporting of the story.
Her spokesman said: “The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue. Each time the story is retold it changes, with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders.”