Medical Matters: There is no clinical evidence to validate homeopathy – and it can even do harm

The ‘treatment’ can delay people from seeking more effective medicinces, says Muiris Houston

After an extensive review of 1,800 scientific papers, it found “there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective”

After an extensive review of 1,800 scientific papers, it found “there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective”

 

While wary of the lack of scientific proof behind so-called alternative treatments, my response to patients taking them is a neutral one. I encourage people to tell me what other treatments they are taking, but in the absence of any side effects and on the understanding that they are being used to complement conventional medicine rather than replace it, I’m pretty relaxed about what is ultimately a personal freedom to choose what we put in, or on, our bodies.

Some scientists and doctors, however, become a little steamed up when alternative medicine enters the treatment equation. They will have welcomed the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia’s recent demolition of homeopathy.

After an extensive review of 1,800 scientific papers, it found “there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective”. It added that homeopathy should not be used to treat health conditions that are chronic, serious, or that could become serious, and warned that people who used the preparations could put their health at risk by rejecting or delaying more effective medicines.

Homeopathy is based on the theories of Samuel Hahnemann, who claimed that “like cures like”, so a substance that causes symptoms can also eradicate them. That process is theoretically achieved using a process of dilution of the substance and subsequent shaking. Homeopaths claim the mixture retains a “memory” that triggers a healing response in the body.

Extensive research

The NHMRC analysis is backed by previous reports from the UK Commons science and technology committee and the Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane has carried out a series of studies which found no good evidence that homeopathy helps flu, chronic asthma, dementia, irritable bowel syndrome, or labour induction. It kept an open mind on whether it might help skin complaints caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cancer, but said that more extensive research was needed to confirm any benefit.

In his recent book, A Scientist in Wonderland, Edzard Ernst, a former professor of complementary medicine at Exeter University, is highly critical of alternative medicine. “There is no such thing as alternative medicine; there are just treatments that work, and those that don’t,” he writes. “Those that work will find their way into the standard armamentarium of medicine, while those that don’t are destined to remain in the realm of quackery.”

Ironically, his first job as a doctor was in a homeopathic hospital in Munich where he learned the “incredible power of the placebo”. But in the book he describes homeopathy as “one of the least plausible treatments in the realm of alternative medicine”. He says: “The clinical evidence . . . does not suggest that homeopathic remedies have effects beyond those of placebos.

“The risks of homeopathy can be considerable,” he writes. “When someone chooses to embrace an ineffective treatment instead of pursuing effective therapy for a serious condition, even seemingly innocent remedies can, by default, turn out to be life-threatening.”

Ernst published a review in 2012 of the harmful effects of homeopathic preparations. Of some 1,160 patients who experienced adverse events, the most common were allergic reactions and intoxications. Some reactions were quite serious and four people died.

Much of the book is about his ousting from his academic post, which he attributes in part to the intervention of Prince Charles, a noted proponent of alternative medicine. Referring to the “inside story” of alternative medicine he says: “ [It] is commonly viewed as a sleepy benign cottage industry where little money is at stake and people are kind and gentle; my story discloses such notions as myths.”

Meanwhile, back at the clinical coalface, homeopathy badly needs some positive scientific studies to help its cause. A Scientist in Wonderland: A Memoir of Searching for Truth and Finding Trouble by Edzard Ernst is published by Imprint Academic (£14.95) mhouston@irishtimes.com muirishouston.com

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.