The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) had overstepped its powers in blocking the UK’s attempt to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda this week, says the UK’s justice secretary and deputy prime minister, Dominic Raab
“The Strasbourg court itself has said for many years that there’s no binding power of injunction. And then later on they said: ‘Well actually, we can issue such binding injunctions. It is not grounded in the Convention’”, Mr Raab said.
The UK’s initial attempt to deport asylum seekers — part of a policy designed to deter dangerous sea crossings of the English Channel — was temporarily thwarted on Tuesday by an injunction from the ECHR.
The UK Government cannot give a fixed date for when it will first be able to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, he said.
Former Tory minister Steve Baker: ‘Ireland has been treated badly by the UK. It’s f**king shaming’
Majority of Brexit voters in UK ‘would accept free movement’ to access single market
Economists need to get their story straight on immigration
Stormont votes to retain some EU trade laws post-Brexit for Northern Ireland
When asked when the first migrants will be deported to Rwanda, Mr Raab said: “I don’t think I can give a precise date.”
“The important thing to understand is that this continuing legal challenge has been around the injunctions. There is a full hearing due in a few weeks and all the issues can be aired there.”
Mr Raab also said the UK has no plan to leave the ECHR, but wants the Strasbourg-based court which enforces it to take a more limited view of its powers.
“Our plans involve staying within the Convention, the European Convention. It is also important the Strasbourg court reflects and stays faithful to its mandate as part of the convention,” he said
Raab said he did not believe the Convention gave the ECHR the power to issue injunctions to block Government action — as it did over British plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda — in advance of its final ruling on a case.
Challenged over death threats on social media to human rights lawyers, Mr Raab said they were unacceptable but Britain’s Human Rights Act had led to an “industry” of lawyers promoting “elastic interpretations” of the law on behalf of their clients. — Reuters
(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2022