Russia had ‘no choice’ but to take military action, Lavrov tells UN

Foreign minister claims US and allies are aggressively undermining the international system that the UN represents

Russia's foreign minister Sergei Lavrov addresses the United Nations General Assembly. Photograph: Mary Altaffer/AP

Russia made its case to the world on Saturday for its war in Ukraine, repeating a series of grievances about its neighbour and the West to tell the UN General Assembly that Moscow had “no choice” but to take military action.

At the heart of foreign minister Sergei Lavrov’s address was a claim that the United States and its allies — not Russia, as the West maintains — are aggressively undermining the international system that the UN represents.

“The future of the world is being decided today,” he said, and “the question is whether or not it is going to be the kind of order with one hegemon at the head of it.”

His speech was Russia’s chance to respond to days of denunciations from the podium at the annual gathering of presidents, premieres, monarchs and government ministers.


The war has largely dominated the discussion, with many countries laying into Russia for its February 24th invasion, nuclear threats, allegations of atrocities and war crimes, and ratcheting up its campaign by mobilising some of its reserves even as the assembly met.

Russia launches fresh strikes on Ukrainian cities as call-up causes chaosOpens in new window ]

Europe should open to Russians fleeing Putin mobilisation, European Council chief saysOpens in new window ]

The speech came amid voting in Russian-occupied parts of eastern and southern Ukraine on whether to join Russia.

Moscow characterises the referendums as self-determination, but Kyiv and its western allies view them as Kremlin-orchestrated shams with a foregone conclusion.

Some observers think the expected outcome could serve as a pretext for Russian president Vladimir Putin eventually to escalate the war further.

“We can expect president Putin will claim any Ukrainian effort to liberate this land as an attack on so-called Russian territory,” US Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned the UN Security Council on Thursday.

Russia has offered a number of explanations for what it calls a “special military operation”.

Among them: risks to Russia from what it considers a hostile government in Kyiv and a Nato alliance that has expanded eastward over the years; restoring what Russia considers to be its historical territorial claims on the country; and protecting Russians living in Ukraine — especially its eastern Donbas region — from what Moscow views as the Ukrainian government’s oppression.

“The incapacity of western countries to negotiate and the continued war by the Kyiv regime against their own people left us with no choice” but to recognise two separatist regions of Ukraine as independent and then to send troops in, Mr Lavrov said.

The aim was “to remove the threats against our security, which Nato has been consistently creating in Ukraine”, he said.

While Ukraine has recently driven Russian troops from some areas in the northeast, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy earlier this week warned the assembly that he believes Moscow wants to spend the winter getting ready for a new offensive, or at least preparing fortifications while mobilising more troops.

Regardless, he declared that his forces will ultimately oust Russian troops from all of Ukraine.

“We can do it with the force of arms. But we need time,” said Mr Zelenskiy, the only leader who was allowed to address the assembly by video this year.

The two countries also faced off this week at the Security Council, in a rare moment when Mr Lavrov and his Ukrainian counterpart, Dmytro Kuleba, were in the same room — though they kept their distance.

The General Assembly voted overwhelmingly in March to deplore Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, call for immediate withdrawal of all Russian forces and urge protection for millions of civilians.

The next month, members agreed by a smaller margin to suspend Russia from the UN Human Rights Council. — AP