Mourinho and Guardiola seeking derby deliverance from gloom over Manchester

City boss struggling with demands of Premier League as Mourinho battles with himself

Jose Mourinho and Pep Guardiola: the United manager appears to have lost some of his love for football while the City coach is getting dourer by the day. Photograph: Getty Images

Jose Mourinho and Pep Guardiola: the United manager appears to have lost some of his love for football while the City coach is getting dourer by the day. Photograph: Getty Images

 

November nears and many of the pre-season forecasts remain valid. Everyone is talking about Manchester, just as predicted. Jose Mourinho and Pep Guardiola are dominating the news, except not in the way most commentators imagined. Tonight’s Manchester derby in the League Cup brings together a side looking for a first win in six games and one routed in extraordinary circumstances at Stamford Bridge at the weekend, an occasion when Mourinho actually complained of being humiliated.

United probably have most to lose at Old Trafford. It is their game, they have lost to their rivals on home turf already this season, and a consequence of the bright start before the Manchester City slump means Guardiola’s side at least retain their position as league leaders. Neither side will be enormously bothered about staying in the competition, though with comparisons already being wheeled out to suggest the opening period of Mourinho’s tenure is no better than that of David Moyes, it is United who appear to be on the brink of managerial meltdown.

Guardiola could simply be struggling with the demands of English football, in particular the number of games and City’s impeccable start was bound to level out at some point. Mourinho, on the other hand, seems to be struggling with himself. His side went behind in 30 seconds at Chelsea without touching the ball, which is already the most unMourinho-like statement imaginable before factoring in the significance of the venue or the behaviour of the home fans and manager. Watching from the sidelines as three more goals went in, Mourinho looked as he has looked for most of the season in Manchester.

Glum, passive, powerless.A speech bubble over his head might contain the words: “Why is this happening to me?”

It seems a reasonable question. Mourinho badly wanted the United job, it was one of the few available commensurate with his background and ability, and crucially he knew exactly what state the club was in because he had been in England for the last couple of years. To give one obvious example, he knew all about the Wayne Rooney situation that now appears to have blown up in his face. His alleged interest in the striker while at Chelsea was one reason why Rooney ended up with a new five-year contract at United, always likely to point towards a messy endgame unless the player could maintain the high standards of his earlier years.

Moyes awarded that contract, Mourinho has ended up with the mess. It hardly matters whether one viewed the initial promise to keep faith with Rooney as a striker and only a striker as either an optimistic ruse to bring the best from him or a cynical ploy to allow him every chance to fail, the fact is Mourinho himself changed his mind a few week later and used him in midfield. And now Rooney has been to all intents and purposes out of the team, with Zlatan Ibrahimovic beginning to discover that United’s supply line to designated strikers is perhaps not all it might be, the optimism surrounding what appeared a solid summer’s transfer business has all but disappeared.

Ibrahimovic, just turned 35, makes a great totem at the front of the attack but has a similar range of movement. While his finishing ability remains undiminished he has never been the quickest and requires a fairly precise service in order to flourish. A lot like Rooney, in other words. So were Mourinho to take Steve Bruce’s advice - a purely theoretical notion, you understand - and give Rooney back his job as main man up front, it would have to be at the Swede’s expense. Two relatively immobile strikers waiting for the ball to be delivered to feet or forehead is just not going to work, although that appeared to be Mourinho’s original plan.

It may have had a chance of working had the support cast done their job, yet none of Mourinho’s summer signings has proved as decisive as the manner in which the manager went out to buy them. If a contest were arranged to try to spot the most expensive player in the world Paul Pogba would not be mentioned in the first few dozen guesses on current form - hence Mourinho’s eagerness to flag up a decent performance against a side lying halfway down the Turkish league and

Henrikh Mkhitaryan is still waiting to properly commence his United career after a series of bewildering excuses. At least Eric Bailly looked the part before picking up an injury at Chelsea, but as an attacking force, which is surely what Mourinho is trying to shape them into, United have stalled.

It could even be the case Mourinho has stalled. He took over the joint-best defence in the division based on goals conceded last season, allowed himself a smile of satisfaction after shutting out Liverpool at Anfield, then lost the plot spectacularly at Chelsea. The old Mourinho was about certainty, not inconsistency. His teams were drilled to within an inch of their lives, not allowed to let their attention wander to the extent of conceding within a minute. United must have thought they had signed the old Mourinho, the one many worried would be too defensive and dour for the club’s traditions.

It appears they have ended up with some unhappy hybrid. Not so good at organising defences, playing the transfer market or transforming teams into slick machines, but still dour. Guardiola, as it happens, is getting dourer by the day too, though a win would probably bring back the smile and easy charm. One wonders if the same can be said of the United manager. Mourinho appears to have lost some of his love for football, the enjoyment is no longer discernible. United fans will know exactly how he feels. Guardian service

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.