The only person convicted of the Lockerbie Pan Am murders is to be released on compassionate grounds. Twenty-one years after the disaster, many questions remain, writes PAMELA DIX
THE FAMILIES of those who died in the bombing of Pan Am 103 will continue searching for the truth. First, we need an inquiry.
One of the first questions asked of me by every journalist and reporter covering the story of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi is: why is there such an apparent divide between US relatives and British or Irish relatives? Why do the Americans believe he is guilty, while we remain to be convinced?
Some imply that doubts about Megrahi’s guilt by some UK representatives put the interests of a mass murderer before those of justice, a folly of the woolly liberal. I think the reasons for the differences in view are more complex.
Within days of the bombing, the then British transport secretary, Paul Channon, stood in the House of Commons and obscured the truth about the number of credible warnings against US aviation. Our suspicions of a cover-up began and have remained to this day. Within three months, the UK families formed a support group, with the motto “The truth must be known”. By then, the families knew that we would have a hard fight ahead to get to that truth.
The bombing of Pan Am 103 is often referred to as an American disaster. Yet it killed people from 21 countries, 47 of them British and Irish. I believe that the fact that it happened on British soil leaves the British relatives feeling a sense of responsibility for all the victims. The bomb was loaded on to the plane at a British airport and it was the British government’s responsibility first to protect travellers from such an attack; second to understand how and why it was allowed to happen and ensure that lessons were learned for air travellers around the world; and finally, to seek and bring to justice those responsible for carrying out the attack.
UK families took this responsibility within the context of a country that has experienced terrorism first-hand for many years, and has also seen numerous miscarriages of justice where innocent people were convicted and jailed for terrorist crimes they did not commit. So it is no surprise that many British relatives have a scrupulous desire to ensure this does not happen again. If Pan Am 103 had taken off from JFK airport, we don’t know what difference this would have made to the way the UK families have responded.
I am not arguing for Megrahi’s innocence and I feel that his decision to exercise his right to silence in the original trial did nothing to strengthen his defence. His co-accused was found innocent, a strong outcome in a Scottish court, where there is the option of a “not proven” verdict.
I welcomed the decision of the Scottish criminal cases review commission to refer Megrahi’s case back to the high court for appeal, an opportunity for us to hear any evidence that might get us nearer the truth. The abandonment of the appeal is the worst possible outcome, as that evidence will now not be heard. But whether guilty or innocent, one thing that everyone agrees on, including the court, is that he did not act alone.
I find it astounding that the UK government seems to have washed its hands of the whole affair and passed on responsibility to Scotland. Jack Straw’s involvement includes stints as home secretary, foreign secretary and justice secretary, and in each of these posts he has had dealings with UK relatives. It was he who concluded the prisoner transfer agreement negotiations with Libya, started by Tony Blair. Yet, when we contacted him about the impact this would have on the families, he said it was a Scottish government responsibility.
Why was Megrahi not excluded from the agreement? Now, the Scottish justice secretary, Kenny MacAskill, has decided to release him on compassionate grounds. It is extraordinary that such a momentous decision had to be made by a man with no background in the case.
I understand why US senators put pressure on MacAskill not to release Megrahi, but wish they would also pressure the UK government to hold an independent inquiry that might establish some of the answers to the bigger questions. Who ordered the bombing? What was the motivation for it? Why was it not prevented? These answers must be sought, whether Megrahi is guilty or innocent.
The primary reason given by Jack Straw and others in government through the years is that such an inquiry might prejudice the criminal process. Now, that argument has no validity. Westminster must not wash its hands of Lockerbie. One step the UK government could take is to follow the example of the Hillsborough disaster, by releasing all official papers (now, more than 20 years after the bombing).
We will resolutely continue our search for the truth. If the UK government fails to hold an inquiry, we will lobby the Scottish government do so and ensure that all responsible British government ministers and officials are called to account. – ( GuardianService)
Pamela Dix is the sister of Irish victim of the Lockerbie bombing, Peter Dix, and a founder member and executive director of Disaster Action, a charity established in 1991 whose members are survivors and bereaved people from over 20 disasters which occurred in the UK and overseas. She lives in England