Letter from Sydney: Turnbull moves from Dr Do-little to man of action

The Australian prime minister promised change and then sat back: until defeat loomed

Australia’s prime minister Malcolm Turnbull (left) and the man he ousted from the past last September, Tony Abbott. Photograph: Peter Parks/AFP/Getty Images

Australia’s prime minister Malcolm Turnbull (left) and the man he ousted from the past last September, Tony Abbott. Photograph: Peter Parks/AFP/Getty Images

 

Since becoming Australia’s prime minister last September, by overthrowing Tony Abbott in an internal Liberal party coup, Malcolm Turnbull has been dogged by failure to meet expectations.

Abbott was the most right-wing prime minister the country had seen and had led his Liberal-National coalition government to the brink of losing power after one term.

His replacement, Turnbull, was a small “l” liberal who believed in same-sex marriage, Australia becoming a republic and addressing climate change. Australia expected a new broom to sweep things clean and the government immediately re-established a strong poll lead. But then he did precisely nothing about any of the policies he held dear, and the honeymoon turned sour.

With most polls putting Labor in with a chance of winning an election due by January 14th, 2017 at the latest, Turnbull needed a circuit breaker. He got two.

The first was a deal with the Australian Greens party that changes the way senate elections are held, making it far more difficult for minor parties and independents to get elected through arcane preference swaps (many see this as the Greens pulling up the drawbridge after they have gone from a minor party to potential kingmaker).

With senate reform in the bag, Turnbull then threatened minor party and independent senators, saying that unless they passed legislation aimed at curbing the power of construction unions, he would call a rarely used “double dissolution” for July 2nd. In one swoop, Turnbull went from Dr Do-little to man of action.

Win-win

Nick Xenophon

Given that double dissolution was last used in 1987, many Australians have had to be reminded what exactly it is. In a normal federal election all the lower house seats become vacant, but only half the senate seats do. In a double dissolution, all of the senate becomes vacant.

It halves the quota needed for election, but the voting system changes to potentially make it a win-win for the government anyway.

Having previously rejected the contentious union legislation – voting against it a second time is the double dissolution trigger – the crossbench senators are unlikely to pass it now, so Australia is already in a 103-day election campaign.

Things got off to a bad start for Turnbull when Abbott, who is still in parliament and running again, said the prime minister had changed nothing. “It’s very easy for me to campaign for the election of the Turnbull government because the Turnbull government is running on the Abbott government’s record because it’s a very strong record,” Abbott said.

Turnbull rejected the faint, damning praise, saying, “The bottom line is there is continuity and there is change.”

When employment minister Michaelia Cash also used the phrase “continuity and change”, fans of US political satire Veep noticed how similar it was to “Continuity with change”, a slogan used throughout series four, when Julia Louis-Dreyfus’s character, US president Selina Meyer, was campaigning for re-election.

‘Hollow and oxymoronic’

Veep Simon Blackwell

“Selina wants to be all things to all people – she wants to assure the American public that government is carrying on as normal after the president has stepped down, that there is no crisis, but she also wants to seem fresh and forward-looking. It did make me laugh a lot when I saw that the Australian PM’s people had been on the same mental journey and come up with the same meaningless phrase.”

Far more seriously than a poor choice of election slogan is the dressing down Turnbull got from the Belgian ambassador after the prime minister’s comments on the Brussels terror attacks. Turnbull said Europe had “allowed security to slip” and “that weakness in European security is not unrelated to the problems they’ve been having in recent times”.

Belgium’s ambassador Jean-Luc Bodson said Turnbull was playing into the terrorists’ hands. “It’s dangerous because it’s precisely what Isis wants – that we would make a confusion between terrorism and migrants and between terrorism and Islam,” he said. “My view is that the terrorists who committed the attacks in Paris and in Belgium are European-raised and born. Maybe from foreign origins, but they are Europeans.”

Labor party leader Bill Shorten said it was too soon for Turnbull to “hand out advice. I think it’s premature for the prime minister be telling the Belgians what they did wrong within 24 hours of what happened in Belgium,” Shorten said.

In this case, however, Turnbull knew exactly what he was doing. Sounding a dog-whistle against immigration never hurt a Liberal party re-election campaign.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.