The Supreme Court is to consider whether alleged victims of sexual violence have any right to be protected from inquiry into prior alleged incidents of a similar kind.
This issue, along with others concerning whether there is any privacy exception or psychotherapeutic privilege for alleged victims asked for information, is to be aired before the court next April in an appeal by a man accused of sexually abusing a girl decades ago.
The man wants to prevent his trial on eight counts of indecent assault, contrary to section 6 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1935, and 10 counts of indecent assault, contrary to section 10 of the Criminal Law (Rape) Act 1981.
It is alleged the incidents occurred in the 1970s and 1980s when the man was minding the girl and her siblings when she was aged between four and 14. The accused was an adult at the time. He denies all of the allegations and maintains his innocence.
Plane-spotters unite: A trip into the high-altitude universe of ‘AvGeeks’
Protestant churches face a day of reckoning with North’s inquiry into mother and baby homes
Pat Leahy: Smart people still insist the truth of a patent absurdity – that Gerry Adams was never in the IRA
The top 25 women’s sporting moments of the year: 25-6 revealed with Mona McSharry, Rachael Blackmore and relay team featuring
The man, who is now in his late 60s, claims in judicial review proceedings that his trial would be unfair and he requires access to a wide range of information regarding every incident the complainant alleges she has suffered from abusers.
A Supreme Court determination notes the claim for documents “trawls very widely and purports to include psychological and medical records”.
The High Court directed that the man should be furnished with the names and addresses of young people who allegedly assaulted the girl, details of a separate allegations of rape, full documents concerning a relation who was prosecuted and any allegations she made against two others. The trial was not to proceed without these matters being disclosed, the judge held.
However, those orders were overruled in the Court of Appeal, which held that issues as to discovery and information should be dealt with by the criminal court overseeing the trial. The substantial proof required to show that an upcoming trial would be unfair was lacking in this case, it said.
A Supreme Court panel of three judges said serious issues arising in the case should be clarified because they affect rights that may inure by statute or under the Constitution in favour of the alleged victim of sexual violence.
The judges intend to consider whether judicial review through the High Court is ever an appropriate vehicle for seeking information for criminal trials such as this.
The court will also examine whether there is a privacy exception or psychotherapeutic privilege to an application for discovery and, if there is, when this protects the alleged victim of sexual violence.
The man’s appeal is scheduled for April 25th.
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Find The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
- Our In The News podcast is now published daily – Find the latest episode here
