UBS is facing a further legal challenge to its controversial takeover of Credit Suisse, as hundreds of individual shareholders – including scores of former employees of the failed bank – are due to lodge a claim in Zurich’s commercial court on Monday.
The Swiss Investor Protection Association (SASV), which represents retail investors, is planning to file the claim on behalf of around 500 Credit Suisse equity investors who suffered steep losses when the bank was rescued by its rival UBS in March.
The takeover, which was orchestrated by Swiss authorities, denied shareholders in both banks a vote on the deal. The 3 billion Swiss francs (€3.1 billion) UBS paid for Credit Suisse was less than half the bank’s market value on the final trading day before the deal was sealed and a fraction of its book value.
It is the second class action by shareholders in Credit Suisse targeting UBS, while there are several lawsuits being pursued by bondholders who were wiped out.
Yes, the US has higher income per capita than Europe, but what is the real measure of a wealthy nation?
Your work questions answered: Can bonuses be deducted pro-rata during a maternity leave?
China the key for tech’s raw materials whether Trump likes it or not
Belfast-based watchmaker Nomadic moves with the times to reinvent retail experience
Last week, UBS announced it no longer needed government support for the takeover, in a move that may help ease public anger over the deal in the run-up to national elections in October.
The SASV is planning to submit its case – which is being brought under Switzerland’s Merger Act – on Monday, meeting a two-month deadline from when the deal was signed-off in June. It is expected the judge would rule on the case within a year.
Arik Röschke, the general secretary of the SASV, suggested that UBS had an incentive to settle this case. He noted if the judge found in the claimants’ favour, UBS could be required to pay all shareholders, possibly costing billions of dollars, though if the bank settled out of court, only the claimants would be reimbursed.
“UBS took over one of the best capitalised banks in Europe at a bargain price in a horse-trading deal,” he added.
While most of the claimants are Swiss, there are other investors from the UK, US, Germany, Austria, Thailand and Dubai. Many are former Credit Suisse staff who acquired shares as part of their remuneration.
“Some of our claimants worked at Credit Suisse for 30 years and part of their payment was in stock,” Röschke added. He said some former Credit Suisse staff had shares that 15 years ago were worth more than 80 Swiss francs, but they received just 0.76 Swiss francs for them as part of the UBS takeover.
“These people stayed with the company and now they have lost everything. It’s sad for these shareholders that their loyalty has been punished.”
The SASV case is being run on a not-for-profit basis, with claimants asked to pay a 250 Swiss francs fee to cover the association’s costs, which could be partly refunded. The Swiss law firm Niedermann Rechtsanwälte has been retained to work on the case.
UBS declined to comment on the case.
The claim follows a similar suit brought by Lausanne-based legal services start-up LegalPass, which has been backed by Ethos Foundation, a body that represents institutional investors owning about 5 per cent of stock in both banks.
At least two law firms – Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Pallas – are representing bondholders who were controversially wiped out when $17 billion (€15.5 billion) of additional tier 1 securities were written down as part of the transaction.
Credit Suisse staff have also inquired about launching legal action after their bonuses linked to the AT1s were also cancelled. Lawyers in the US, meanwhile, are working on cases that target individual former managers at Credit Suisse for their part in the bank’s downfall. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023
