Sir, - A question sprang to mind as I was reading the report entitled "Unease as Iceland sell its entire DNA" (The Irish Times, January 23rd). Why has Iceland been able to sell the rights to its DNA while numerous peoples in remote areas of the world have not been given the same opportunity? Instead, they have had samples of their DNA removed by representatives of the Human Genome Project. Patents have even been taken out on the use of these "ethnic genes". DNA information is now a resource in pharmacological research. If something can be paid for, it can be stolen. I know that if the Irish Government gave exclusive rights allowing any biotechnology company to exploit the genetic information of Ireland, I would not be rushing forward to donate a sample.
I do take objection to the last section of the article. Headlining the phrase "blond, blue-eyed" conjures up images of Nazi eugenics. As this inference is in no way justified, it cannot be regarded as anything other than scare-mongering. I do not mean to suggest that the motives behind the acquisition of DNA information rights are entirely benevolent. Biotechnology companies are, after all, money-making organisations. They are not in the business of medical research purely for the good of our health. However, drawing on Nazi images in relation to modern genetic research is unhelpful. One must try to stimulate informed debate, not misinformed debate. - Yours, etc., David Moore,
Fortfield Park, Terenure, Dublin 6w.