Chernobyl anniversary: The disputed casualty figures

Photographs from the archive: In 2006, Bryan O’Brien and Kathy Sheridan reported on the devastated area around the remains of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine, 20 years after the catastrophic explosion in one of its reactors. Here, Dick Ahlstrom assesses the problems with the data about the number of people who died or suffered long-term illness as a consequence of the accident

The world's largest land-based moving structure has been built to prevent deadly radiation spewing from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster site for the next 100 years. Video: Reuters

 

Three decades on, disagreement continues over how many people died as a result of radiation released by the explosion in Chernobyl reactor four.

Estimates vary wildly, from 4,000, as declared in a study published in 2006 by the UN, up to 200,000, as reported by environmental body Greenpeace.

Both sides claim they have hard evidence and scientific research to back up their findings, but if this is so, why does such a gap exist? Surely at this stage, so long after the accident, we must know how many were killed by Chernobyl?

It is important that we should have this information, because it will teach us a great deal about the effects of radioactivity on human beings.

Much of our understanding of this comes from uranium miners, radiation plant workers, survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, and accidents in nuclear power plants, such as Three Mile Island in the US and, more recently, Fukushima in Japan.

The greater the exposure to radiation, the higher the risk. In Chernobyl’s case, the exposure was colossal for some. Early responders, including plant workers and firefighters, developed acute radiation sickness, which killed 28 out of 134 suffering from it.

Data accumulated by the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation and the World Health Organisation suggest that an additional 4,000 additional deaths from cancer will occur among other groups exposed to the the highest levels of radiation.

These include 240,000 “liquidators” sent in to clean up radioactive materials afterwards, 116,000 evacuees who were living near the plant, and 270,000 residents who continue to live in areas with high levels of fallout.

There might be more cancer deaths directly attributable to Chernobyl, but these will be lost in the general cancer statistics, the 2006 report says.

Greenpeace used data provided by a large number of experts from the region, claiming cancer rates are all much higher as a result of Chernobyl. It says the death toll in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine could reach 200,000.

Unfortunately, there is no match-up between the two reports. At least some of this is caused by having to estimate incidences on the basis of uncertain exposure levels, says Dr Ciara McMahon of the Environmental Protection Agency. Models are used but predictions can still vary greatly even within a single study.

Perhaps the biggest killer in number terms over time, however, will not be radiation. It may well be the stress and anxiety among the estimated 5 million living in contaminated areas or among those forcibly removed from their homes in the days following the explosion.These deaths will remain hidden in the statistics.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.