Iona Institute says document ‘not reflective’ of all opinions at synod

Gay and Lesbian Equality Network says synod document an opportunity for change

The discussion document produced by the synod on family issues in the

Vatican

was not reflective of all the opinions expressed at the gathering of bishops and cardinals,

David Quinn

READ MORE

, director of Christian organisation the Iona Institute

said yesterday.

“A lot of people are annoy- ed at the document and what was in it,” Mr Quinn said. “It’s an extremely tentative and provisional document. It does not summarise the opinions of a lot of the participants at the synod,” he said.

“It’s not even close to being the final word. There will be another summary done at the end of the week and I dare say that will be much more reflective of what has actually been discussed,” he said.

A marked shift

In a marked shift in tone, the synod released a preliminary document on Monday calling for the church to welcome and accept gay people, unmarried couples and those who have divorced, as well as the children of these less traditional families.“There is no question that a softer pastoral tone is going to be adopted towards divorce, cohabiting Catholics, towards Catholics who are gay,” Mr Quinn said.

“It is to be welcomed so long as the document is quite clear as to the church’s teaching on these issues. The church has a particular view of the moral life, but there are different ways you can lead people into the moral life. You can do it with a rod or you can do it with soft words. Obviously the Vatican and the pope say the softer approach,” he said.

Suggests change

Chairman of the

Gay and Lesbian Equality Network

Kieran Rose

said the document suggested a change in the tone of the church’s approach to gay people. “It is a welcome change to hear the Vatican talk about ‘accepting and valuing’ people’s sexual orientation,” he said.

“The Vatican document also recognises that across the world lesbian and gay couples are parenting children and acknowledges that the ‘needs and rights’ of their children should be given, priority,” he said.