Value for Money

This week Value for Money looks at  GARDEN PRUNERS

This week Value for Moneylooks at  GARDEN PRUNERS

Secateurs Felco Classic, €69.99
Highs:
This fire-engine red, Swiss-made secateurs was locked in a display cabinet in our local garden centre. It is now, without question, the sharpest garden tool in the Pricewatch box and clearly a top-quality product. It is lightweight and delivers a sharp, clean cut to thick and thin branches with ease. The blade is so sharp we couldn't help worrying about what it would do to our fingers if they were in the wrong place for a fraction of a second too long. According to the manufacturer, the revolving handle optimises the force behind the blades.

Lows:If, however, like Pricewatch, you're prone to losing garden implements in the bushes, this might be wasted on you. And if you're not prepared to take care of it, we fear it would be a complete waste of money.
Verdict:Good but dear
Star Rating: ** *

Gardena 343 Pruning Shears, €34.99
Highs:
Another excellent shearing implement and sharp enough to do pretty much all the pruning jobs it was given. We could not really see a great deal separating it from the Felco model except for the price. The handle has a good solid grip and the blades are very sharp. There is a ring on the handle which is handy for storage, although the wrist strap seemed just a little pointless. It locks easily enough.

READ MORE

Lows:Unlocking it, on the other hand was just a little troublesome and some of those who tried this found it almost impossible to open with a single thumb.
Verdict:Good and not so dear
Star Rating: ** **

Tesco Value Pruner, €2.99
Highs:
For €2.99, you can't really go wrong and if it lasts a full summer, it will have been good value. This is a grand product that cuts and prunes without hassle. True, it does not deliver as sharp a finish as some high-end models, but it is over 20 times cheaper than the most expensive secateurs we tried and is certainly not 20 times worse. The locking clasp is well positioned and opens and closes without much fuss.

Lows:While it might not be 20 times worse than the most expensive options, it is certainly a fair bit worse. The span of the blades was a bit narrow and it did struggle when attempting to cut fairly thick branches. The handle was coated in very smooth plastic which might get just a bit slippy when clasped in hot sweaty hands on a summer's afternoon.
Verdict:Virtually disposable
Star Rating: ** *

Yeoman Garden Secateurs, €14.99
Highs:
If you like your garden implements pink, then this is the one for you. It is truly a shocking colour and one which will be almost impossible to lose in the undergrowth. It is pretty sharp and cuts neatly without ragged edges. It was also the only product to come with a handy tool pouch and the rough rubber handle ensures a good grip.

Lows:Given that tool belts are supposed to be manly, you'd wonder what the makers were thinking when they decided that a pink tool belt was a good idea. Who is it for? The only people who likes things this pink are girls under six and you wouldn't want them running about with an implement this sharp. The sterling price of £9.99 (€12.60) was on the packaging which made us wonder why we had to pay €2.40 more than that.
Verdict:A bit too pink, maybe?
Star Rating: ** *

Professional Gardener Bypass Pruner, €6.99
Highs:The handle on this pruner is made with a slightly rough textured rubber which gives it a better grip than the other product we sourced in Tesco. The blade is coated with Teflon, although what difference that makes was difficult to establish. It is very competitively priced and will certainly do a job for you.

Lows:But for how long? It seemed to lack the sturdiness of some of the more upmarket pruners and the lock kept catching. It was also the stumpiest of the pruners and compared to some of the elegant models we tried it looked distinctly cheap and clunky. It left the most ragged edges on most of the branches we cut with it.
Verdict:Cheap but clunky
Star Rating: **

*****Excellent
****  Great
***    Fine
**      Below Par
*        Awful