Northern Ireland could lose half its veterinary medicines in Brexit row

Northern Ireland could lose half of its veterinary medicines in a new Brexit row threatening to prolong the political stalemate in the region, it has emerged.

The British Veterinary Association told the Lords committee on Northern Ireland in written evidence that it was “extremely concerned” about the issue even though the Windsor framework sealed between Rishi Sunak and Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, in March was sold as a solution to the protracted saga regarding Northern Ireland.

The issue centres on the requirement of manufacturers of medicines for farm animals and pets to get their medicines batch-tested in the EU before they can be put on sale in Northern Ireland.

The BVA welcomed a grace period for the continuing movement of the products into Northern Ireland until 2025 but said unless a permanent solution was found, sales of medicines ranging from anaesthetics to vaccines for salmonella could be discontinued.

EU requirement that states produce and stick to a five-year spending plan is a welcome restraint

---

A Great Disorder by Richard Slotkin: Ambitious mapping of America’s past to its present via myth

---

Amazon to open Irish website next year with promise of faster deliveries

---

‘Britain needs a shake up’: UK economist from a Kilburn Irish family on banks, business and Boris

---

A similar problem had arisen under the original Northern Ireland protocol for hospital and pharmacy medicines, which has since been solved.

“Failure to obtain a permanent solution could see Northern Ireland lose access to 51 per cent of the veterinary medicines it receives. This would affect all sectors – farm, equine, pigs, poultry, and pets – and will have significant implications on animal health and welfare, public health, trade, and the agricultural economy,” the BVA wrote.

The issue is one of several raised in a new report by the House of Lords protocol on Northern Ireland committee.

“Though the Windsor framework is a clear improvement over the original protocol, it is highly complex,” said the committee chair, Michael Jay. “Businesses need clarity. The government and the European Union both need urgently to explain what the Windsor framework means in practice for businesses.”

The committee examined in detail the economic, political, legal and constitutional impact of the Windsor framework. The issue over the Brexit trading arrangements in Northern Ireland have cast a long shadow over local politics with the Democratic Unionist Party boycotting a return to powersharing for the past 18 months.

The framework was designed to dramatically reduce the barriers to trade that arose from the original Brexit deal sealed by David Frost in 2020. It requires businesses in Britain to treat Northern Ireland as if it was within the EU, meaning exports to the region had to comply with EU laws.

Under the Windsor framework most of these checks are swept away for goods that can be proved to be sold only in Northern Ireland, especially in supermarkets, corner shops, and canteens in schools, hospitals and factories.

But the committee heard there were still issues around the movement of livestock from Northern Ireland to Britain and back. Also posing a problem was the sheer technical and legal complexity of the framework.

The committee called on the government and the EU to do more to explain in plain English what the provisions of the framework meant in practice, and to publish a comprehensive summary including a consolidated text of the amended original protocol. – Guardian