Oscar honours Bacall and Willis (not Bruce)

Is handing out honorary Oscars really such a good idea? True, it means that disgracefully overlooked geniuses (Alfred Hitchcock…

Is handing out honorary Oscars really such a good idea? True, it means that disgracefully overlooked geniuses (Alfred Hitchcock for one) finally get the recognition they deserve. But parading legends up the red carpet can make contemporary stars seem a little like unprepossessing pygmies.

Anyway, the Academy have already announced the recipients of next year's honorary gongs and it's a bumper crop. The indomitable Lauren Bacall, now a frisky 84, is to be honoured for performances in such classics as T he Big Sleep, Key Largoand Written on the Wind. Gordon Willis, christened the Prince of Darkness for his work on such classics as The Godfather, All the President's Men, Klute, Annie Halland Manhattan, will become one of the few cinematographers to be so honoured. And the legendary (for once the word is justified) maestro Roger Corman, who perfected the art of low-budget production, will also finally get what he deserves.

Few will be surprised to read that Corman, director of The Wasp Womanand Attack of the Crab Monsters, has not won before. Many will know that Bacall, twice nominated, has not garnered a statuette. But surely Willis won for The Godfatheror its first sequel. The near-unbelievable truth is that he wasn't even nominatedfor either gangster epic, both Best Picture winners. Quite bizarre.

Donald Clarke

Donald Clarke

Donald Clarke, a contributor to The Irish Times, is Chief Film Correspondent and a regular columnist