Even careless play must be dealt with for safety of all players

Mike Brown’s kicks to Conor Murray’s face could still have caused serious injury

Conor Murray: the Ireland scrumhalf required eight stitches to a wound in the corner of his eye and did not return for the end of the game with England. Photograph: Billy Stickland/Inpho

Conor Murray: the Ireland scrumhalf required eight stitches to a wound in the corner of his eye and did not return for the end of the game with England. Photograph: Billy Stickland/Inpho

 

England fullback Mike Brown’s boot collided more than once with Conor Murray’s face in a ruck during last Saturday’s Six Nations Championship match at Twickenham. The Ireland scrumhalf required eight stitches to a wound in the corner of his eye and did not return for the final nine minutes of the game.

 Shaun Veldsman, the television match official (TMO) for the game, ruled the contact as “accidental”, having been directed by referee Romain Poite to review the incident.

The Six Nations-appointed citing commissioner for the game, Scotland’s Douglas Hunter, determined in the 48-hour review window, that the English player had no case to answer.

Brown tweeted in the aftermath that his actions were acceptable on foot of the TMO’s call. The England fullback’s actions appeared reckless rather than malicious, but there is a provision in the sport’s laws (10.4 c, Kicking an opponent) that does not absolve a player just because the contact was accidental.

The law currently provides for a censure to punish players for recklessly if unintentionally causing injury and ultimately they should be responsible for their actions.

At a time when World Rugby is very keen to promote player welfare – the brain trauma/ concussion issue should remain at the top of the agenda – it seems ludicrous to permit an action on a pitch that is dangerous in the extreme. The consequences of a kick delivered to the head or temple by an 18-stone player, however accidental, could in itself be a concussive blow.

Second Captains

Common sense

Or will it require an incident in an underage game before there is a consensus that there is no acceptable level of collateral damage in an accident not adjudicated to be reckless?

Common sense should illuminate the way forward.

Toulon’s Romain Taofifenua received a three-week ban for kicking Ulster’s Stuart Olding in the head during a European match in 2014. He was aiming for the ball but struck the head because he was off balance and wrestling with a player. It was accidental, but it was also reckless.

Leinster’s Fergus McFadden was also called to account for catching Connacht’s Nathan White with a boot to the head and he too received a three-week ban. So where is the consistency?

A statement issued by Six Nations’ organisers outlining the disciplinary cases arising from the weekend revealed that Brown had avoided any action being taken for an act that was reviewed at the time on the big screen by referee Poite and TMO Veldsman.

Further review

His actions merely highlight an increasingly popular action within a sport where the tariff of being a millimetre off is one that is simply way too high to pay.

Ireland coach Joe Schmidt said in the aftermath of the game that there was no malice in Brown’s actions but he was correct in asserting later that World Rugby needed to review the gambit of players attempting to draw a kick at a ball in a ruck situation. “They have people who look at those things and I have never, ever tried to influence that. The one thing that I did identify is it is something that appears to be a strategy because there is a lot of kicking the ball out of the ruck,” Schmidt said.

“It’s probably something that even the lawmakers or the officials have to have a bit of a look at regarding player safety, particularly with the head and particularly the eyes, as it was in this incident.

“Conor has got eight stitches in the corner of his eye. There was a bit of fear that there might be damage to the eye but there’s not thankfully.”

Italian tighthead prop Martin Castrogiovanni has been cited under law 10.4 (b) for stamping/trampling on the toe of an opponent and faces a hearing on Wednesday.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.