How the GAA made a crisis out of a difficulty

The issue of penalties in hurling should have been properly addressed last February

Waterford’s Austin Gleeson, goalkeeper Stephen O’Keeffe and Shane O’Sullivan get ready to meet Cork goalkeeper Anthony Nash’s penalty in Sunday’s Munster SHC replay in Thurles. Photograph: Cathal Noonan/Inpho

Waterford’s Austin Gleeson, goalkeeper Stephen O’Keeffe and Shane O’Sullivan get ready to meet Cork goalkeeper Anthony Nash’s penalty in Sunday’s Munster SHC replay in Thurles. Photograph: Cathal Noonan/Inpho

Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 09:00

The GAA’s response to the penalty problem in hurling is clearly an emergency measure but it makes you wonder what everyone was thinking back in February.

Then a motion to congress to address the issue had to be withdrawn, ostensibly for drafting reasons but also in the belief as was acknowledged by the director general Páraic Duffy at the time it would probably have been defeated.

This triggered a period of unease for the GAA. Already on notice from an increasing number of voices within the game – especially former inter-county goalkeepers – that players were in danger of serious injury, officials opted to cross their fingers and tick off the days until next year’s congress when a watertight draft could be proposed.

Nerves finally broke at the weekend when Waterford goalkeeper Stephen O’Keeffe came rushing off his line just as his Cork counterpart Anthony Nash was striding in to convert one of his trademark penalties. O’Keeffe blocked the ball but a melee erupted as players clattered off each other.

Compounding the difficulties was the peculiar “clarification” issued to the Sunday Game on behalf of referees. This stated it was now permissible to rush the free or penalty taker as the puck would be adjudged “taken” as soon as the sliotar was touched rather than when it was struck.

A surprise

This interpretation came as a surprise to many people – including some in Croke Park – and raised the hair-raising prospect of teams charging at each other when frees are taken, anywhere on the field.

Such alarming vistas added to the growing health and safety concerns – with more and more focus on lower grades and age groups where the reflexes and stick technique of those on the goal line would be even more exposed – to make this a crisis in waiting.

The GAA’s medical, scientific and welfare committee haven’t as yet issued a statement but it’s in all likelihood a matter of time as representations have already been made by county team doctors and concerns have been expressed within the committee.

The pressure to do something by way of a new interpretation even allowing for the fact the championship is up and running became irresistible.

In an era when the Disputes Resolution Committee is demanding administrative best practice within the GAA and the Rules Advisory Committee is keeping the Official Guide annually updated the tolerance for ambiguity is wearing thin and it was always likely that leaving a serious issue like this hanging for a whole year would prove impractical.

I remember a Central Council meeting at which a delegate in all crusading seriousness declared to his colleagues in support of someone who he felt was being harshly treated by the letter of the law: “If it’s choice between fair play and the rules I say, to hell with the rules!”

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.
From Monday we're changing how readers sign-in to comment, click here for more information.