Madam, – Gemma Hussey (August 20th) is right to be concerned at Dr Muiris Huston’s article concerning gender balance in medical schools’ intake. There are, however, more important issues surrounding the aptitude test introduced this year.
1. Although near maximum Leaving Certificate points are not necessary for the good practice of medicine, admission on the basis of these points is the only fair and transparent way that access can be guaranteed. Further, selection on these points is administered by our own Department of Education and not some outside agency. 2. It is unfair to students who have applied themselves over many years to gain these points to now find that on the basis of their aptitude tests they can have points deducted. 3. Although it is frequently suggested, there is no evidence that high achievers lack many or some of the other skills and traits necessary to make a good doctor. 4. The aptitude test will serve only to help those who can afford to pay for coaching to do well in these tests.
The inclusion of aptitude tests in the overall points will lead to a dumbing down of third level education. – Yours, etc,
Madam, – Gemma Hussey (August 20th) sees in the HPat a plot to discriminate against women, whereas I see an effort to assess suitability for a career in medicine. She states that the points system is “fair” and while I would not dispute this, I would add that it is limited.
In the same way that a portfolio is required for entry to art college and certain architectural schools surely other criteria should apply besides being “hardworking”, “bright” and “brilliant” to gain admission to medical school? – Yours, etc,