US politicians seek 2008 withdrawal

The US House of Representatives yesterday voted to impose a September 1, 2008, deadline for withdrawing all American combat troops…

The US House of Representatives yesterday voted to impose a September 1, 2008, deadline for withdrawing all American combat troops from Iraq, prompting a quick veto promise from President George W Bush.

In a mostly partisan 218-212 vote, House Democrats succeeded in attaching the deadline to legislation spending more than $124 billion in emergency funds, most of it for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan this year.

"The American people do not support a war without end and neither should this Congress," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, calling the Iraq war "a grotesque mistake."

Debate now shifts to the Senate, which could vote as early next week on its version of the war-spending bill.

READ MORE

Senate Democrats have crafted slightly different timetables for removing troops from Iraq. Under their plan, which Republican leaders oppose, the Pentagon would begin withdrawing troops no later than four months after enactment of the legislation. The measure sets a "goal," not a requirement, of finishing a withdrawal by March 31, 2008.

Some centrist senators, who could cast the pivotal votes, were still mulling their positions.

The House vote was a significant victory for Pelosi and her fellow Democrats, who took control of Congress in November on a pledge to end the unpopular war in Iraq.

Two years ago, most lawmakers shied away from speaking out against the war and yesterday's vote underscored the change.

"One of the things that accounted for this result," said Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank, "is that public opinion has continued to move. ... People are very anti-war."

Despite polls showing broad dissatisfaction with the war, Bush has increased US troop strength to quell violence in Baghdad. While that appears to have slowed attacks, violence spiked yesterday when a suicide bomber blew himself up, wounding Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Salam al-Zobaie.

Bush, who as commander-in-chief does not want Democratic lawmakers meddling in the war, condemned the House vote.

"They set rigid restrictions that would require an army of lawyers to interpret. They set an arbitrary date for withdrawal with no regard for conditions on the ground. And they tacked on billions in pet projects that have nothing to do with winning the war on terror," Bush said.

But House Democrats, geared up for battle with Bush in the final two years of his presidency, disagreed.

Democratic Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, who says the war has sapped military readiness, said, "We're going to make a difference ... We're going to bring those troops home."

The narrow margin of the vote was far short of what Democrats would need to override any presidential veto.