Lessons from cases of Roma children taken into care should form part of policing reforms
Opinion: ‘The actions of An Garda Síochána in these cases conformed to the “ethnic profiling” definition of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance’
‘I am happy that the Minister for Justice Frances Fitzgerald (above) and the acting Garda Commissioner Noirin O’Sullivan took the time to join me in meeting the families of both children to apologise for the upset caused to them by removing their children from their care.’ Photograph: Alan Betson / The Irish Times
Former minister for justice Alan Shatter appointed me last December to carry out a special inquiry into the exercise by one or more members of An Garda Síochána of powers under section 12 of the Child Care Act in respect of a child in Athlone (Child A) and a child in Tallaght (Child T), Co Dublin, who were removed from the care of their families in October last year.
The two blonde children were removed from the care of their Roma parents under section 12 of the Act and placed in the custody of the Health Service Executive. Section 12 allows a garda to remove a child from a family without a prior court order where there is an immediate and serious risk to the health or welfare of the child.
After interviewing 42 people and weighing up the information, I concluded that the readiness to believe that Child A, a two-year-old boy, might have been abducted exceeded the evidence available and was tied inextricably to the fact that his family was Roma. Whatever doubts gardaí had in relation to the boy should have been decisively put to rest when his father informed them the toddler had albinism.
The situation of Child T, a seven-year-old girl, was more complex. The decision to take the little girl into care was driven primarily by a combination of: inaccurate information from the Coombe hospital; the past experience of An Garda Síochána in which children about whom child protection concerns had been raised were removed from the jurisdiction; and a readiness to believe that Child T may have been abducted because she was a blonde, blue-eyed child living with a Roma family.
When they invoked section 12, it was reasonable for An Garda Síochána to have concerns about the child’s welfare. However, these concerns should have been alleviated following confirmation by the Coombe hospital of Child T’s birth information.
I am firmly of the view that physical dissimilarities between parents and their children do not constitute a reasonable basis for suspecting that such children have been abducted.
I concluded that the actions of An Garda Síochána in these cases conformed to “ethnic profiling” as defined by the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI). The ECRI defines ethnic profiling as: “The use by the police, with no objective and reasonable justification, of grounds such as race, colour, language, religion, nationality or national or ethnic origin, in control, surveillance or investigation activities.”