Jailed rapist in serious condition after 46 days on hunger strike, court told

A jailed rapist is in a serious condition after 46 days on hunger strike in prison in protest at his conviction, the High Court has heard.

By order of the court the man cannot be named and neither can the prison.

The man is protesting because he says he is innocent, the court heard.

On Wednesday, Paul Carroll SC, for the prison governor and the Irish Prison Service, said his clients were seeking declarations in relation to whether the prisoner had capacity to continue the hunger strike, whether the prison authorities were complying with the law in relation to the strike and “what should happen going forward.”

Asylum seekers who worked pre-pandemic not eligible for Covid-19 support

---

Childcare scheme to health workers to include cleaners, Zappone says

---

Laid-off Irish Debenhams workers raise funds for Bangladeshi staff

---

Woman homeless for 11 years finally gets a home of her own

---

The man’s situation was becoming more serious, he has underlying health difficulties and has suffered a significant weight loss of some 13 kilogrammes, counsel said. He is still taking liquids.

Counsel sought permission to serve short notice of the proceedings on the man’s solicitors and have the case returned to court within a day because the man is in serious danger, possibly at the risk of death.

The application was made on a one side only represented basis.

The man has no difficulties with his conditions in the prison and is aware the authorities were making this application, he said.

His solicitors are also aware and had inquired whether it would be possible for him to participate or observe the hearing via video link from prison. The man has been in regular contact with his next of kin, his wife, counsel said.

Mr Justice Tony O’Connor granted permission for short service of the proceedings on the man’s solicitors and said the case could come back on Thursday afternoon.

The judge noted the request for video facilities and said he could only at this stage express the court’s wish such facilities be made available if possible.