Haass’s modest proposals remain stuck while DUP calculates the electoral risks

Opinion: It is difficult to get a coherent position from Unionists on what exactly is bothering them

Peter Robinson with Martin McGuinness. But would he have sat down with him of his own volition? Photograph: Arthur Allison

Peter Robinson with Martin McGuinness. But would he have sat down with him of his own volition? Photograph: Arthur Allison

Tue, Feb 4, 2014, 00:01

In mid-December a neighbour offered this opinion on the Haass talks: “You know there is absolutely no chance of that shower doing a deal.”

And then he launched into a pessimistic rant which showed absolutely no faith in any of the North’s leaders. It’s not a unique opinion to hear in Northern Ireland but maybe it would be useful for Northern politicians to be aware of such cynicism.

It’s just over a month since Richard Haass and Meghan O’Sullivan quit these shores, leaving behind modest proposals for helping Northern Ireland to begin its escape from the stranglehold of parades, flags and the past. It’s all gone flat since then and that’s reflected in the aforementioned public scepticism.

While limited in its ambition, the Haass document contains useful ideas, particularly on the past. The proposals on parading are a bit of a fudge: the Parades Commission can be disbanded but, regardless of what body or bodies replace it, it’s still likely there will be a riot at or near Ardoyne in north Belfast next July Twelfth.

On flags there were some initial ambitious proposals such as an additional “neutral” Northern Ireland flag, and the tricolour possibly flying during, say, visits by President Michael D Higgins. Almost predictably, there was no agreement and finally the matter was kicked into touch with the proposed creation of the Commission on Identity, Culture, and Tradition. If established, it would have 18 months or so to come up with a way forward. Another fudge, of course, but at least there would be potential for some future progress.

There was meat on the bone when it came to the past. It was proposed to create a single Historical Investigations Unit to inquire into all past killings. An Independent Commission for Information Retrieval also would be established where perpetrators who gave information about killings would have limited immunity. It was also proposed to institute an Implementation and Reconciliation Group and a conflict archive.

The structures on the past primarily are designed to allow victims access information about how their loved ones were killed. Ultimately, whether they learn the truth depends on groups such as the IRA, loyalist paramilitaries and the British state helping provide that truth. The likelihood is that some will, some won’t, but at least architecture would be in place that would put pressure on all protagonists to deliver. With unionists contending the Fianna Fáil government of Jack Lynch was a “midwife” at the birth of the Provisional IRA in 1969-1970, this would include the Irish Government.

Party leaders meeting

The five main party leaders have been meeting about once a week to discuss how to bring Haass forward. They met yesterday

and are due to meet again today at Stormont. But so far little seems to be moving. What is agreed is that the one politician who can kick-start Haass is the First Minister. And so far he’s not for shifting.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.