How this project was compiled

 Round table talks at the Dáil na nÓg  ‘Let’s Talk About Mental Health’ National Youth Parliament  in Croke Park last year. Photograph: Chris Bellew

Round table talks at the Dáil na nÓg ‘Let’s Talk About Mental Health’ National Youth Parliament in Croke Park last year. Photograph: Chris Bellew

Tue, Feb 4, 2014, 13:40

This extensive investigation into Relationships and Sexuality Education in Irish schools was made possible by the support of the Mary Raftery Journalism Fund. It was written by Peter McGuire and Louise Holden was consultant.

Research began with an extensive analysis of the academic literature and policy documents on the topic, which includes but is not limited to a 2007 report by researchers from the Children’s Research Centre at Trinity College, a 2010 study by UNICEF Ireland on adolescent experiences of sexual health and behaviour in Ireland and, perhaps most crucially, the 2010 Dáil na nÓg report Life Skills Matter: Not Just Points, which was compiled and written by young people themselves.

Student views

At all stages of the research, and in keeping with the spirit of the Mary Raftery Journalism Fund, the key focus remained on the actual experiences of young people through their own eyes, as opposed to how their experience is interpreted by parents, teachers, or organisations.

As part of the research, we canvassed the views of 14 current students, as well as six people under the age of 25, about their experiences of relationships and sexuality education.

One person was contacted through the youth website Four were approached at random at a Dáil na nÓg event, while four were contacted through the Dáil na nÓg press office. One was contacted through the Young Social Innovators programme, one was sourced through personal contacts. Two were sourced through social media, and one was the President of the Irish Secondary School Union (ISSU).

The people under the age of 25 included two student union representatives, three people who had provided information for the website, and one person sourced through social media.

Prominent anti-abortion organisations including Life Pregnancy Care and Youth Defence were asked to suggest young people to contribute opinions, but this offer was not taken up.

The Department of Education and Skills

Circulars and guidelines from the Department of Education and Skills also informed this research, particularly Circular 0023/2010, which advised schools to only use external agencies for RSE with caution, and Circular 0037/2010, which reminded schools of their obligations as regards RSE. The SPHE Subject Inspection Report, published last November, also informed this work, while each of the 63 inspection reports that formed the data set for the DES’s overall inspection report were individually examined.

Freedom of Information

The Irish Times
submitted three Freedom of Information request to the DES. One of these requested information on complaints made to the DES or any organisation under its aegis about whether there was any follow-up or sanction on schools which had breached its guidelines on cautious use of external agencies in the RSE and SPHE programmes. The DES conducted a thorough search and found that it had not followed up on or sanctioned any schools that had breached its guidelines.

The second request asked if any complaints had been made to the DES about the activities of any external agencies in schools, including but not limited to the Irish Family Planning Association, Youth Defence, CURA, and Belong2; the request referenced many other agencies. The DES said it had received no complaints.

According to the SPHE Inspection Report, the DES inspectors found, “In many school reports, inspectors recommended that schools adopt procedures on the use of external facilitators that are in keeping with Department Circular 0023/2010 Social, Personal and Health Education (SPHE) & Relationships and Sexuality Education: Best Practice Guidelines for Post Primary Schools.”

The third request asked the DES if it could identify the name and location of the schools which had used external facilitators, and which agencies they were. In response, the DES said “the Inspectorate did not collect detailed information about the content of RSE sessions presented in schools by external facilitators. Furthermore, the Inspectorate did not directly seek the names of external facilitators. Therefore, your request is refused under section 10 (1) (a) of the Freedom of Information Act, 1997 & 2003, which provides that a request may be refused if the record concerned does not exist.”

The DES refused to release more information about what children are learning in RSE in schools, primarily on the grounds that this information could be used to compile information “in relation to the comparative performance of schools”. This is despite the fact that the inspection reports, although lacking in important details, could already be used to compile information “in relation to the comparative performance of schools”. The DES also said that schools had a right to confidentiality with regard to school inspection reports.

School survey

Just 11 out of over 40 schools contacted – including 38 who formed the data set of the SPHE Inspection report - were willing to provide information on their RSE programme. Due to the low response rate from schools, the information provided is of little value as it is difficult to make baseline comparisons.


In no particular order of importance, representatives from the following organisations were interviewed for this series: The Teachers’ Union of Ireland, the Association of Secondary Teachers Ireland, the Irish National Teachers’ Organisation, the Joint Managerial Body, the Health Service Executive, Here2Help, the Department of Education and Skills, the Irish Family Planning Association, the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre, Choice Ireland, Atheist Ireland, the Children’s Research Centre (Trinity College), the Union of Students in Ireland, Belong2, the Irish Secondary School Union,, the Ombudsman for Children, Bodywhys, Life Pregnancy Care, Youth Defence, ShoutOut, Young Social Innovators, Love for Life, CURA, Accord, and the Cork Sexual Health Centre. A number of politicians were approached, including Senator Ronan Mullen and Aodhan O’Riordan of the Labour Party. At least three individual SPHE and/ or CSPE (Civic, Social, Personal Education) teachers were also consulted.

Family & Life did not respond to any requests for interviews. Pure in Heart were unable to contribute to this article, which was written and researched around the time of the tragic death of Tom O’Gorman, who worked for the Iona Institute. The Iona Institute shared a building with Pure in Heart. However, Pure in Heart had previously spoken to other media outlets; most notably, they were interviewed for a feature in The Sunday Times on December 8th, 2012.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.