Change one thing: The future of academic freedom and university autonomy – and why it matters

Dr Jim Browne, president of NUIG, says universities are in a constant state of tension, truly a part of and yet apart from, society

Tue, Apr 1, 2014, 01:00

The concepts of “academic freedom” and “university autonomy” tend to evoke different responses in readers: for academics and university managers, they are seen as the cornerstones of an enlightened education sector; for others, they are increasingly viewed with suspicion and scepticism.

University autonomy connotes the freedom of the institution to govern itself. Academic freedom is concerned with the right of individual academics to research and teach and indeed, sometimes forgotten, the right of individual students to learn, without interference from external sources.

Academic freedom is often viewed as the right to speak “truth to power” without fear or favour. It also imposes an obligation on the individual academics to contribute to the advance of fundamental knowledge through enquiry, scholarship and research: speaking truth to power is premised on the notion of an objective commentator whose views are evidence- based and informed by research and scholarship.

The notion of the university as “a part of, yet apart from” society is also bound up with academic freedom and autonomy. An interesting recent example of “speaking truth to power” and the university being genuinely “apart from society”, was the warnings of a small group of academic economists – I am thinking of Morgan Kelly and Alan Ahearne – of the impending property crash in the late 2000s. Would we be in a different place today had their evidence-based and research- informed advice not been drowned out by self-serving conventional wisdom?

The university is rightly called upon to meet the demands of society for appropriate programmes which meet student and employer needs, research which serves society and ultimately leads to innovation and job creation. The university exists in this constant state of tension where it is expected to be truly a part of and yet, if it is to serve its purpose, must be apart from, society.

Those who manage the public purse must respect university autonomy and academic freedom while insisting on appropriate accountability for the public monies they allocate to the university on behalf of the taxpayer. Those who promote university autonomy and academic freedom have a responsibility to account for the use of public funds, as institutions and individuals.

Autonomy has to be balanced with responsibility. Ultimately, rights are preserved and guaranteed by continuing good faith in the discharge of associated responsibilities. For the university, the right to autonomy is earned by taking responsibility for the overall performance of the institution: for the individual academic, the right to academic freedom is guaranteed by accounting for the proper use of that freedom.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.