Dublin man gets 10 years for rape

A notorious Dublin criminal has been jailed for ten years for one of the “most repulsive” sex offences ever encountered at the…

A notorious Dublin criminal has been jailed for ten years for one of the “most repulsive” sex offences ever encountered at the Central Criminal Court, a trial judge said today.

Mr Justice Paul Carney declared Stephen 'Rossi' Walsh (62) of Belgrave Road, Rathgar, a sex offender for raping and orally raping a nine-year-old girl in the early 1990s.

Mr Justice Carney commented that the “guess-the-fruit-and-veg” game, in which Walsh tricked his blindfolded victim to take his penis in her mouth, was one of the most repulsive sex offences he has ever encountered in his 18 years tenure as judge and that he could see no mitigating factors in the defence case.

He said he found it “particulary revolting” that Walsh had planned the “sex game” by purchasing the fruit and vegtables in a Spar shop beforehand.

READ MORE

He also noted the “inherent gravity” of the attacks, the young age of the victim and Walsh’s threats to the victim’s parents.

Mr Carney said he could find no mitigating factors which would reduce Walsh’s sentence. He said Walsh had “disentitled” himself to the most fruitful forms of mitigation; an early guilty plea, genuine remorse and previous good character.

He imposed seven years post release supervision and warned Walsh he could be jailed again if he fails to abide by its terms.

Outside court, Walsh’s victim, 25-year-old Ms Ruth Dunne waived her right to anonymity and spoke of how glad she was that “it has been exposed to the public what he really is”.

She thanked her family and the courts service as well as Mr Justice Carney and said she was very pleased with “the justice that has been done today.”

The now 25-year-old victim said in a statement read out by Ms Isobel Kennedy SC, prosecuting, that she been attending counselling since 2004 for post traumatic stress disorder, depression and feelings of shame and self-loathing.

She said aside from “severe physical pain and soreness”, she’d felt confused and fearful after the rapes.

She described feeling scared for her sister the day Walsh took the two girls in his car to a beach area and raped his victim behind a rock during a game of “hide-and-seek”.

She recalled feeling “sick” and biting down hard when Walsh put his penis in her mouth after telling her the item began with “c” during a blindfolded game he’d called “guess-the-fruit-and-veg.”

The young woman described her relief when she learned her attacker had been jailed for arson in a television news report in 1993 but said she “felt sick” when she heard of his release years later.

She said she had to take several days off work when she saw him by chance leaning on a wall in Dublin last year ahead of the case, adding that being called a liar under cross-examination and waiting on the jury’s decision at the trial’s end was the “worst time” of her life.

“What happened to me has not gone away, it will never go away, I am a victim of real child abuse”, she stated.

The jury took seven hours on the fourth day of the trial to find Walsh guilty of the offences between January 1st and November 9th, 1993.

Pleas of not guilty had been entered on Walsh’s behalf after he refused to indicate which way he was pleading to the two counts of rape and one count of oral rape. He has ten previous convictions including a 15-year arson sentence at the Special Criminal Court in 1993.

Detective Sergeant Barry Walsh told Ms Kennedy that the attacker brought his young victim alone to a beach area one day after pretending to her parents he was taking her to play with his children.

Walsh raped the little girl by grabbing her from behind, removing her trousers and underwear during a game of “hide-and-seek”. He covered her mouth when she screamed in pain.

He threatened that he’d “get” her parents if she told anyone about the attack as he dropped her back home.

Walsh raped her again when he brought her and her sister to the beach area for a game of “hide-and-seek”.

Mr John Phelan SC, defending, submitted to Mr Justice Carney that his client did not accept that he’d taken advantage of the little girl. He submitted that his client hadn’t attempted to communicate or intimidate the victim.

He asked the judge to also bear in mind his client’s age and to be as lenient with sentencing as possible.