Woman cleared of murder but found guilty of manslaughter of her boyfriend

A 48-year-old woman has been cleared of murdering her boyfriend but found guilty of his manslaughter by stabbing him in their Tipperary home.

The mother of two had asked for an acquittal on a number of grounds, including the possibility that he had “come towards the knife” she was holding while they fought.

The jury saw photographs of the injuries he had caused her in the fatal fight, including two bite marks to her arm.

Inga Ozolina (48), originally from Latvia, but with an address at Old Court Church, Mountrath, Co Laois, has pleaded not guilty to murdering Lithuanian native Audrius Pukas at The Malthouse, Roscrea on November 20th, 2016.

Murder getaway car was bought in south Dublin dealership, gardaí say

---

Warrants for raid on Loughinisland journalists to be quashed

---

Ian Bailey trial hears Toscan du Plantier planned to meet ‘a poet’

---

Ian Bailey had fresh scratches on arms the day body found, court told

---

The Central Criminal Court heard that the 40-year-old father of two died at the scene from a stab wound to his chest. He had also sustained two other knife wounds in the incident.

The trial heard that the couple had a volatile relationship, which was violent at times.

Witnesses gave evidence of seeing her with various injuries in the past, and she had obtained two safety orders against him. However, these had lapsed at the time of his death.

She told gardaí that domestic violence had been an ongoing problem in their relationship, and that she had been in a women’s shelter.

“My life is just a living hell,” she said. “The safety order didn’t stop him assaulting me over and over again.”

She had his number saved under “Sadist” in her phone.

She said that she was preparing dinner around 1am on the day of the incident, having worked a late shift. She said that they had begun arguing over him having friends over and drinking in the apartment while she was at work.

She explained that he had then begun throwing pictures of her children into the fire before turning violent.

She said that he had pulled her hair, pushed her towards the floor and begun hitting and biting her. Photographs of her injuries, including two bite marks, were shown to the jury.

She said that she had grabbed the closest thing with which to defend herself, a big kitchen knife.

She added that her doctor had previously suggested that she have something sharp handy with which to defend herself “just in case”. However, her doctor testified that this had not happened.

The accused said she and the deceased had continued to struggle and he had flinched. She said she was surprised when he suddenly stopped and let her go, as “normally when he gets violent, he hits me to the end”.

She said that she washed a few things in the kitchen sink, including the knife. She said she had not realised it had cut him or that there was blood on the blade.

She said she then followed him downstairs to check on him, because “once he starts on me, he never retreats so easily”.

She said he was lying on the floor, breathing very heavily. She said she thought that he was having a seizure because he had asthma, so she used an inhaler on him.

“Then I realised there was blood,” she said.

She said that after trying First Aid she “chased” to the garda station.

The jury saw CCTV of her pulling up in her car and entering the station in her dressing gown and slippers.

A garda gave evidence of her first words to him that morning.

“I’ve killed my boyfriend, come quick, come quick,” she had said. “I stabbed him. I pushed the knife into him, come quick.”

It was put to her in interviews that this was the truth, and not her account of the knife accidentally cutting him during the struggle without her knowledge.

She denied washing the knife to get rid of DNA evidence, which was still found. Despite the knife being clean when seized from the cutlery drawer, microscopic analysis found specs of blood matching her boyfriend’s on the blade.

Caroline Biggs SC, defending, asked the jury to consider a number of grounds for acquittal.

“Ultimately, you’ve to consider whether there’s a reasonable possibility that the cause of the fatal wound was him coming towards the knife, a reasonable possibility she was acting in justifiable self defence, or a reasonable possibility that she didn’t have the intention to kill or cause serious injury,” said Ms Biggs. “On any of the three, she’s entitled to acquittal.”

Paul Murray SC, prosecuting, asked the jury to find the accused guilty of murder.

He said the three knife wounds to Mr Pukas could not constitute an accident.

“This was not a situation of self defence either,” he suggested. “Even if you pay credence to the account given by Ms Ozolina of what happened, at the end of the day, it was she who had the knife used on an unarmed, drunken man.”

Mr Justice Alexander Owens gave the jury a third option, one of finding her not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter. He said this could arise if the jury was satisfied she had acted in excessive self defence, or did not have the necessary intent for murder.

The seven men and five women began deliberations on Friday afternoon. They had spent just over 12 hours in their jury room trying to reach a unanimous verdict before returning to say they had reached an impasse.

They were then given the option of reaching a majority decision, and returned a few minutes later with a 10-2 majority verdict of not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter.

Justice Owens refused an application for continuing bail and remanded the accused in custody for sentencing on July 1st.