Man imprisoned boy (13) after dispute over football game in Longford

Muhammad Khalid receives nine-month suspended sentence after pleading guilty

The court heard  the man got out of his car and grabbed the 13-year-old and put him into the vehicle’s back seat.  Photograph: Tom Merton

The court heard the man got out of his car and grabbed the 13-year-old and put him into the vehicle’s back seat. Photograph: Tom Merton

 

A father of three has been given a nine-month suspended prison sentence for falsely imprisoning his neighbour’s 13-year-old child in a dispute over a game of football.

Muhammad Khalid pleaded guilty on Thursday to falsely imprisoning the teenager at Cloverwell, Edgeworthstown, Longford, on March 31st, 2016.

The court heard the former garage worker had been rushing on his way to a pre-wedding ceremony when he came across a number of youngsters playing football in the middle of a street.

When, it was alleged, the group failed to move out of the way, Khalid got out of his car and grabbed the 13-year-old and put him into the vehicle’s back seat.

Garda Michael Fox said in a statement taken with the victim, that the boy alleged when he tried to get out of the car he was restrained from doing so and was struck a number of times.

The boy managed to free himself after Khalid stopped the car having driven approximately 100 metres up the road.

‘Terrified state’

Garda Fox told of the “very terrified state” the young boy was in when he took a statement from him, a sense of feeling made worse by the fact his father had been away from home at the time of the incident.

The boy, who cannot be named due to his age, said while he had been left with no lasting physical injuries, the incident had impacted him psychologically. “I don’t go outside or anything because I am afraid of it happening again,” he told Judge John Cheatle.

In defence, Niall Flynn BL said his client was fully aware a section 15 charge of false imprisonment in the Circuit Court carried a maximum prison term of 14 years.

He also said Khalid and the boy’s family had been close acquaintances and asked for any consequent sentence to rectify the “fractured relationship” that now existed between both parties.

He also also said his client had made full admissions, apologised on two occasions, and was full of remorse.

Previous incidents

The defence barrister added the incident was in no way premeditated and was a “spur of the moment” decision that lasted no more than 30 seconds.

Mr Flynn added though that the incident may have been precipitated by a number of previous incidents, one of which involved chilli sauce being left on the front door of his house.

In sentencing Khalid to nine months’ imprisonment – which was suspended – the judge identified two letters written by the accused to the boy’s family seeking the charges to be withdrawn as “significant aggravating factors” in the case. A mitigating element, he added, was Khalid’s guilty plea.