The moral sense of Down man Francis Hutcheson

The forgotten Irish philosopher liked to think the best of people

Portrait of Francis Hutcheson by Allan Ramsay at Hunterian Museum and Art Gallery in Glasgow

Portrait of Francis Hutcheson by Allan Ramsay at Hunterian Museum and Art Gallery in Glasgow

Fri, Aug 8, 2014, 01:00

It’s just like a philosopher to be born and to die on the same date. Such was the fate of Co Down man Francis Hutcheson (August 8th, 1694, to August 8th, 1746), not a household name yet once one of the most influential thinkers of the West.

He spent 10 of his happiest and most productive years in Dublin, writing not only a rough draft on what became utilitarianism but analysing the nature of human emotions in a radically new way.

One of Hutcheson’s insights that still illuminates today is the idea that people are not wholly self-interested. Behind what seem like selfish acts are gestures of benevolence.

This led to the bold claim that humans don’t have just five senses (sight, smell, sound, taste and touch) but many more, including a sense of beauty and of humour but also, critically, a moral sense.

Prof Michael Brown, historian at the University of Aberdeen and author of Francis Hutcheson in Dublin, 1719-1730: The Crucible of his Thought (Four Courts Press) will explain further. On Hutcheson’s double anniversary, the man himself provides today’s idea, in his own words: “While we are only intending the good of others, we undesignedly promote our own greatest private good.”

 

Who was Francis Hutcheson?

Prof Brown: “A man of the Enlightenment. He was born in Drumalig, Co Down, and was educated at a dissenting academy in Killyleagh, before moving to the University of Glasgow. He qualified as a Presbyterian minister before becoming a teacher at a dissenting academy in Dublin in about 1719.

“In 1730 he moved back to Glasgow to take up the chair in moral philosophy. He died in 1746, during a visit with friends in Dublin, and is buried at St Mary’s Church.”

 

Why was he important as a philosopher?

“Hutcheson was a key figure in the development of the Scottish Enlightenment. He corresponded with David Hume about the Scotsman’s A Treatise of Human Nature and taught the economist Adam Smith, who later held the same chair of moral philosophy.

“Hutcheson also coined the phrase ‘the greatest happiness for the greatest number’ as a way of thinking about what motivates moral behaviour, which was later popularised by the English utilitarian Jeremy Bentham. ”

 

What was his big idea?

“Hutcheson’s big idea was what he called ‘the moral sense’. At the time, most philosophers agreed with John Locke that human beings had no innate ideas: the mind was a clean slate when a human was born. Although Hutcheson agreed, he disagreed that this meant humans had no inherent moral character. Instead he argued that human beings were born with a natural capacity to approve or disapprove of people’s behaviour. Human beings are effectively judgment-makers.

“Importantly, Hutcheson thought that this moral sense was pre-rational, meaning that deciding whether something was right or wrong did not involve a calculation of your self-interest. In this he disagreed with Thomas Hobbes, who thought humans were motivated by personal interest and material gain.”

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.