NCH rows: stop the squabbling and focus on the fundamentals

Disputes at the top level of the NCH are overshadowing more immediate concerns at the ground level

Minister for Arts Jimmy Deenihan: The NCH’s board ‘will have absolute clarity on all governance and operational issues’. Photograph: Eric Luke

Minister for Arts Jimmy Deenihan: The NCH’s board ‘will have absolute clarity on all governance and operational issues’. Photograph: Eric Luke

Wed, May 21, 2014, 01:00

The National Concert Hall unveiled details of its 2014-2015 concert series at the end of last month and has been garnering a lot of publicity over the past few weeks. The two are not entirely connected, however.

The publicity focused in the first instance on the resignation of five board members (Bruce Arnold, Pat Heneghan, Artemis Kent, Patricia Slavin and chairwoman Margaret Ryan), and a split on the board that led to four of those resignations (the chair’s resignation is apparently unconnected to the split).

The Minister for the Arts Jimmy Deenihan also announced that the NCH is to be put on a statutory footing. He told the Dáil on May 7th that the decision is in line with a similar decision made last year about the Irish Museum of Modern Art. The proposed legislation, he said, will mean that the venue’s next board “will have absolute clarity in respect of the position on all governance and operational issues at the National Concert Hall”.

He explained that, “as a statutory body, and in line with good governance, the NCH will be required to prepare and adopt a statement of strategy, submit progress reports, and will also be required to prepare an annual business plan, to be submitted as appropriate to the Minister and the Oireachtas. This is in common with the changes being proposed for other national cultural institutions.”

He also said that, “as a statutory body, the National Concert Hall will have enhanced capacity to engage in fund-raising. This again is common to other national cultural institutions which are already established as statutory bodies and which have strong fund-raising programmes.”

Fund-raising, of course, was at the heart of the conflict that led to the resignations, specifically a link-up with the Lincoln Center in New York in a plan that seemed to be in line to soak up large sums of money without any guarantee of delivering sure returns. But nothing that has come into the public domain in the wake of the resignations has managed to clarify whether the expensive fund-raising plans were the real issue or whether there was a more fundamental struggle involved. Board member John McGrane told this newspaper that the differences concerned “board governance and board focus”, without being explicit on what the differences actually were.

Whatever way you choose to look at it, the damage is widespread. It has affected the board, the chief executive Simon Taylor and staff morale, and it draws attention to the sometimes insurmountable challenges of large-scale fund-raising.

Fund-raising from the private sector is a hobby horse of the Minister and of the Arts Council. Damage has been done in that area, too. If one of the largest cultural institutions in the State runs away from the risks, what hope is there for smaller fry? There are those in the arts community who are sounding warning notes that Raise, the Arts Council’s award scheme to support private fund-raising, is not working, and will turn out to be a bad news story rather than a good one. The models that everyone looks at in this area are in the US. But philanthropy in the US is a very different matter to philanthropy in Ireland. Otherwise the arts would have been showered with private money during the years of the boom.

Jimmy Deenihan and his Dáil questioner, Fianna Fáil’s Seán Ó Fearghail, both showered the NCH’s management and board with praise. They obviously haven’t spent much time in the hall, where some seats no longer pop back into an upright position when no one is sitting in them. Fire regulations specify that “all escape routes are kept unobstructed and immediately available for use” and an escape route is defined as “a route by which a person may reach a place of safety and means in relation to any point in a building, a route from that point”.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.