• RSS
  • Text Size:
  • -
  • irishtimes.com - Posted: January 12, 2010 @ 10:53 am

    Omphaloskepsis for the nation

    Jim Carroll

    As happens every couple of months, there has been yet another outbreak of introspective navel-gazing amongst the blogging classes. You know how it goes, don’t you? In this case, it was prompted by a piece in the Sunday Times which screamed from the rooftops that Irish blogging was, like, so over. This was followed by predictable huffing and puffing amongst those who blog or used to blog which always happens when The Sunday Times in particular decides to poke those who blog or tweet. Then, there was Una Mullally’s guest post on Twenty Major’s blog about the subject. That received a couple of hundred comments which sort of nixes the the notion that no-one really reads blogs any more. Naturally, there were other pieces about this too.

    All of which means that it may be high time for me to have a look at my own belly fluff. It could get ugly. Hey, at least you have been warned.

    Let’s start with the gist of the arguments doing the rounds about why there seems to be a whole lot less active blogging going on. There are many reasons for this (the weather, new Irish comedy on the telly, running out of things to say, joining Sinn Fein, winning the Lotto), but two seem to stick out.

    The rise of Twitter means many who used to blog find that they can now easily say what used to take a whole blog post to say in 140 characters or less. After all, you don’t really need all that much space for a link to a photo of a rabbit wearing a Hooters’ baseball cap. It’s easier to pen a text message than to blog. Of course, you can do both but some prefer one to the other.

    Then, there are those who were blogging like their lives depended on it a few years ago before the real world took over or, in some cases, their blogging lead accidentally or otherwise to other, better paying writing work. Many then abandonded WordPress faster than you could say “could you give us 600 words on what our blind panic reaction to snow and ice says about us?” A pity because, again, you can do both and, when it comes to excercising that writing muscle, blogging is sure better than a lot of other treadmills out there.

    Whatever about such causes and effects, it’s probably a better idea (as it usually is) to look at the bigger picture. Ever since Johannes Gutenberg came up with his printing press, there have been constant innovations in how people broadcast and publicise their opinions, news and views.

    While some view the arrival of the internet as a significant nail in the coffin of print, it was really another way of getting opinions, news and views across. Just because we migrated from print to a screen didn’t mean we’d reached some sort of “Game Over” level. Hell no, we were just at start of a process of constant attrition.

    The rate of change really has sped up hugely in the intervening years. For instance, Twitter was still one of a gazillion newly-hatched web ideas doing the rounds four short years ago. Four years or less from now, you can bet that there will be a new Twitter taking up the slack and causing people to pen “Twitter is so over” articles. I’d say the lads in the Sunday Times have one scheduled for February 2014. By then, you’ll probably have to make a gap in Rupert’s pay-hedge to see it.

    Yet whatever new technology comes along to usurp Twitter’s place in our love and affections will still do the same thing: communicate news, views and opinions. People may be using different tools and there may be far more bells and whistles attached, but those tools are basically doing the same task. Once we used newspapers, magazines and the DIY option of fanzines and newsletters; now, it’s web mags, publications, blogs, tweets and Facebook status updates. Different tools, the same job.

    Because these internet tools are now easily and, by and large, freely accessible by all comers, there has been a huge bump in quantity and volume. Just as the democratisation and flat-earthing of recording and distribution methods means a band doesn’t necessarily need the assistance of a studio, label or distribution company to record, release and sell their album, the availability of a wide range of publishing and blogging software means anyone can be an online publisher, journalist and editor.

    Yet just as having a Myspace profile doesn’t make you the next big thing, having a blog doesn’t make you the new Woodward. Or Bernstein. It takes a little more than just having the tools to type and publish to do that. This is where the quality benchmarks come into play.

    Of course, the vast majority of the tens and hundreds of thousands who started blogs over the last five years probably never had any intention of taking their blog any further than being a channel for news, views and opinion from them to their friends. It was peercasting, not broadcasting.

    On the other hand, there are bloggers who saw blogging as their golden pitch and who have thrived on the medium. These are writers, activists, analysts and smart folks who may not been able to, or didn’t want to, get on the radars of newspaper commissioning editors, for example, but who found blogging was an amazing way for them to get their news, views and opinions across – news, views and opinions which attracted lots and lots of readers in turn. They may have thought they were in the peercasting business, but what they had to say and the quality with which they said it attracted readers/fans/followers far beyond their immediate sphere of influence.

    I think what we’re seeing right now is a natural shift rather than some sort of changing of the guard. For every couple of hundred bloggers who have abandonded blogging and embraced other ways of getting their news, views and opinions across, there are bloggers who just ain’t going anywhere else yet.

    More importantly – and this is something which seems to have been overlooked – their readers aren’t going anywhere else either. Sure, there are other mediums competing for readers’ time and attention, but those readers keep coming back again and again and again to those bloggers/writers who provide them with the news, views and opinions they value.

    In time, blogging will morph into something else – and again, it will be a natural shift rather than some radical all-off-this-bandwagon-now move – and those bloggers will move in that direction and board another micromedia vehicle. And, as long as those people are ‘casting quality news, views and opinions, the readers will probably follow.

  • 42 Comments

    1.
    January 12, 2010
    11:24 am

    As I have already said on Twenty’s blog, and I mean absolutely no disrespect to Una when I say this, who decides when blogging is ‘over’?

    As you said Jim, for many it is about ‘peercasting’. Many people who read this blog, and I daresay Una’s when she blogged probably read Nailler’s, State and others. It is a group of online peers, people with a collective interest in music and an appetite for new sounds.

    But that is to pigeon-hole everyone. I am fairly confident that a venn-diagram of blogs visited by those who read OTR has many circles. While there may be a solid common ground there are bound to be other interests served by blogs covering sports, the arts, politics, travel, fashion and any and all other interests.

    Each and every one of those interests may foster a group of its own through ‘peercasting’ – people who consume, for example, football blogs and on occasion pop over to OTR to dip in to a bit of music.

    I think it is a bit insular to suggest that blogging is ‘over’ because a few peers within a specific field have stopped/gone quiet of late.

    Comment by Joe
    2.
    January 12, 2010
    11:29 am

    Joe – I hear you and I certainly dont think blogging is over. For some peope, their blogging is over because they got bored and moved on but the crux of the matter is that there are still people using blogging tools to get their news, views and opinions out there – and there are certainly as many readers as ever. I now read far more blogs (via Google Reader) than I have ever read. Sure, some are not as active as they once were but there are others which are still producing quality week in, week out.

    The other thing to remember is that keeping a blog going, keeping it active and fresh, is a bit of a task. It involves taking time, getting the ideas together, writing them up, monitoring the reaction etc. It really is another branch of journalism in ways. Ever peercasted blogs require far more attention and effort than tweeting a picture of your cat with a scarf around his/her neck.

    As for OTR’s Venn diagram – man, I couldn’t even begin to imagine where the one would go. Broad church, many pews

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    3.
    January 12, 2010
    11:33 am

    More importantly – and this is something which seems to have been overlooked – their readers aren’t going anywhere else either.

    This is a good point. When you add the blog visits, RSS subscribers, Twitter followers etc there’s been no slowdown from my point of view anyway.

    And surely the fact that people are still reading and expecting content is the best indication of whether something is ‘over’ or not.

    Comment by Twenty Major
    4.
    January 12, 2010
    11:53 am

    Of course blogging isn’t over. What a vapid suggestion. The more interesting question is why the Irish media, by and large, fails to effectively use blogging and its offspring.

    Comment by Tormentor
    5.
    January 12, 2010
    11:55 am

    Twenty – yep, agree – as long as there are readers, nothing is “over” or “dead:”

    Tormentor – The more interesting question is why the Irish media, by and large, fails to effectively use blogging and its offspring.

    Uhm, this blog is on the Irish Times website in case you didn’t notice

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    6.
    January 12, 2010
    12:01 pm

    Pretty much agree with that Jim and the following is just to build on your points…

    I think that Twitter has actually been excellent for blogging in terms of separating the wheat from the chaff. While there are far less blogs being regulalry updated now than there were 18 months ago, those that have survived the cull still include many of the better writers, the deeper thinkers, and the greater experts in their field.

    Yes, there remains plenty of mediocre blogs too. However, as long as they are enjoying themselves, who cares? At the same time, I did have to laugh at the likes of Irish Economy, Cedar Lounge Revolution, Outside In, Human Rights in Ireland, etc. being included in lazy generalisations of how Irish blogging has gone to pot. Perhaps the best blogs are increasingly niche ones and therefore only appeal to a limited audience. However, that diminishes neither their importance nor the quality of their output.

    Finally, Twitter has pretty much killed off the trite “great post dude” culture that bloggers habitually and unthinkingly engaged in with each other. Nothing wrong with a little moral support, of course. However, it had reached ridiculous levels of excess, resulting in a culture that celebrated mediocrity and stymied diversity and debate.

    Having said all of that, it is not worth getting too bogged down on the medium. The best newspaper columnists, for example, make their points just as forcibly whether their article is printed on paper or appears on a computer screen. The main thing is that people with something worthwhile to say remain capable of being heard.

    Comment by JD
    7.
    January 12, 2010
    12:20 pm

    Thanks for pointing that out, hombre. Didn’t feel the need to point out the blindingly obvious.

    The Irish Times (despite its previous ambivalence towards the internet sphere) is the exception that proves the rule with Irish online media

    Comment by Tormentor
    8.
    January 12, 2010
    12:21 pm

    In some areas blogging has only recently come into its own, for example commentary on economics and the Irish economy has become much more accessible through blogs like irisheconomy.ie, progressive-economy, true economics etc, where the country’s leading economists discuss their analysis and some times mix it with intelligent non-professional commentators.

    Blogging that’s about breaking news or general wildfire blogging will be taken over by twitter etc, but more thoughtful analytical writing may be left as last man standing.

    Comment by Mumblin' Deaf Ro
    9.
    January 12, 2010
    12:26 pm

    JD @ 6 – exactly. It’s the news, views and opinions which matter most, no matter if they’re on a screen or a zine

    MDR @ 8 – which is a little how newspapers are going as well – leave the breaking news to online and keep the commentary and analysis for print

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    10.
    January 12, 2010
    12:28 pm

    PS: As a Saab fan the Saabsunited blog (written by Steven Wade in Tasmania) has been the main source of news on the death throes and comebacks of the company over the past year and has been way ahead of reuters or other news agencies. In fact GM have had to issue several press statements to counter the news being broken on that blog, which has effectively become the main repository of well-placed leaks from sources inside Saab. It’s also a very good mix of technical info almost romantic fiction about Saab.

    It just goes to show that if you have a good topic for your blog it can work very well – maybe the least successful blogs are those with a thin idea beind them or which are just an outlet for random thoughts.

    Comment by Mumblin' Deaf Ro
    11.
    January 12, 2010
    2:32 pm

    i don’t really understand blogging… in fact, sometimes, i don’t really understand the internet…

    …this is the only one i read… and only then occasionally…

    just call me john waters…

    Comment by Ally
    12.
    January 12, 2010
    2:46 pm

    Blogging definitely isn’t dead. As long as the blogs out there are publishing good content regularly, they will continue to thrive. Readers will return, day after day.

    However, the thing that has suffered, in my opinion anyway, is reader feedback in the comments section. When I started my blog, people left comments on the post. Now however, my twitter feed and facebook fan page both post feed updates whenever the blog is updated. This provides alternate places for people to comment. For example, where a post would have read “5 comments” before, now it reads “2 comments”, 1 like and 1 comment on facebook, and a RT or an @ reply on twitter.

    It is this kind of thing that leads to lazy journalists saying “blogging is dead”. It’s not dead, it just has branched out to gather feedback from an abundance of social media outlets. Outlets which actually increase traffic blogwards, rather than taking it away.

    Comment by Ronan
    13.
    January 12, 2010
    3:01 pm

    Ronan – It’s funny that you mention reader comments and feedback because it’s trying to keep on top of these which is the busiest part of the OTR job! If anything, as blogging is supposed to be dying, the comments here have gone way, way up. While you’d expect it on certain posts, look at the amount of comments that rough and ready piece on irish comedy on RTE got. I think it shows that there just are not as many outlets as people think for the stuff that really interests readers.

    It’s not dead, it just has branched out to gather feedback from an abundance of social media outlets. Outlets which actually increase traffic blogwards, rather than taking it away.

    Yep, I agree. As I said in the post above, you just need to look on blogging as another tool in the kit when it comes to broadcasting news, views and opinions.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    14.
    January 12, 2010
    3:12 pm

    “These are writers, activists, analysts and smart folks who may not been able to, or didn’t want to, get on the radars of newspaper commissioning editors, for example, but who found blogging was an amazing way for them to get their news, views and opinions across – news, views and opinions which attracted lots and lots of readers in turn. They may have thought they were in the peercasting business, but what they had to say and the quality with which they said it attracted readers/fans/followers far beyond their immediate sphere of influence.”

    Very well put. This has been my favourite thing (and it was quite surprising initially) about blogging ever since I started. I’ll be celebrating five years blogging in six weeks, and I’ve no plans to stop as long as I have readers, and they don’t seem to be going anywhere.

    Rick O’Shea may have quit blogging, but he’s still going to be a national DJ who reads blogs and talks to the bloggers over Twitter, just as Úna will surely still be reading blogs to see what Irish bands might be good on her show, just as Nialler will still be sending Day & Night readers to his favourite blog posts. And outside this circle, there are plenty of smaller music blogs that are well worth reading: Asleep on the Compost Heap, Those Geese Were Stupefied, and Thrill Pier to name a few. The pace at which Irish blogging was growing has slowed down, but it is a small country, and as well as that, much music writing is (naturally enough) focused on Dublin. I’m sure by this time next year, there’ll be a few more blogs that are worth our time.

    Comment by shane
    15.
    January 12, 2010
    3:34 pm

    I’ve thought about this a lot over the last week and can thankfully disregard every doltish suggestion on the demise of Irish blogging. I don’t know the reasons that she came to such a ludicrous conclusion but thankfully it’s not true.

    Rather than diluting the blog readership, these new communications platforms have simply served to disperse the feedback, as Ronan mentioned. There are still plenty of blog readers out there as this site and the post in question demonstrates. I guess it all depends on what the goal is, for bands they use the services for self-promotion and that’s exactly how Twitter is best defined, a popularity engine for chatterboxes. Its character limit means there’s just enough for a hint and link to the content at large and can be used to distribute information across a much wider network than a blog-only readership.

    I don’t think Irish blogs have really got off the ground yet either. There’s still a lot more to come in time ahead by way of skilled writers who learn to stream huge amounts of traffic to a blog base by way of careful social networking, exceeding the limits of their home base. For example, expand your contacts’ base beyond people you personally know…there is no fun in making new friends/readers/followers/contacts otherwise. Seeing as Social Networking has gone from strength to strength in a matter of years, the full potential of its use is only just becoming clear, and if it can be used by extensive bloggers to direct a great deal more people to their posts by way of succinct one-liners, then surely blogs are not over but have in fact, only just begun.

    Comment by Naomi
    16.
    January 12, 2010
    3:37 pm

    re: post 10 – “technical info almost romantic fiction about Saab” – I sense the next Mumblin Deaf Ro album concept coming together!

    Comment by dermot
    17.
    January 12, 2010
    3:42 pm

    Jim,
    Another interesting perspective like Una’s original post. As someone who has just kick-started an Irish blog – NottheNuacht.com – of sorts this week, I hope this isn’t the end of Irish blogging in itself but perhaps the end of another cycle. Bloggers will stop blogging and new ones will start blogs because blogging can be time-consuming and because starting a blog is so straightforward.
    I think there are and have been some great Irish blogs out there and some such as Maman Poulet and Slugger O’Toole do play a part in setting a news agenda.
    Twitter has certainly changed the dynamic but, as you mentioned in reference to Una’s post, if posts are still getting over 1000 posts then rumours of the death of Irish blogging may just be exaggerated.
    Cheers,
    Adi

    Comment by Adi
    18.
    January 12, 2010
    4:01 pm

    shane – exactly – you may have set up the Torture Garden with one aim in mind and then, you attracted readers you didn’t know and they kept coming back to hear more about DM Stith, Cathy Davey and Arcade Fire. But even if you didn’t have those “new” readers, I’d wager you would still be doing the blog

    naomi – i think the number of blog readers is growing, not reducing – especially if the number of 1st generation blogs are decreasing. Readers still need stuff to read – why else have we in newspaperland lasted so long?

    dermot – MDR better give OTR first dibs on the “Saab sign MDR” story

    Adi – I think seeing it as the end of one cycle and the start of another cycle is a v good way of putting it.

    I also think it’s worth pointing out how, for journalists like me, a blog like this gives you the kind of freedom you’d never get elsewhere. I write about stuff here I’d never get away with in The Ticket – yet, as I can see from the traffic and volume of comments, it gets a reaction because readers want to read this stuff. Yes, folks, more blogs about Tipperary hurling, the terrible state of the Green Party and Irish comedy on TV to come

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    19.
    January 12, 2010
    4:49 pm

    Some very salient points here.
    The thing that seems to have been overlooked in all this debate about the decline in productivity of lots blogs is the impact the recession my have had on it all. From what I can see, most blogging and reading of blogs is done during office hours. People are under a lot more pressure in their jobs now and probably realise that it’s not a great idea for their bosses to perceive them as someone who spends half the day foostering around on the internet.
    But it’s far from over, and I doubt it ever will be.

    Comment by Andrew
    20.
    January 12, 2010
    4:57 pm

    What Twenty said. If you count the aggregate, most frequent writers can say they’ve got the same eyeballs now as they had as virgin bloggers five or six years ago. It’s just that a lot of attention has shifted to activity streams like Twitter and onto YouTube or subscription video channels.

    Plus, truly dependable Irish broadband means more Torrents, lifestreaming and porn on demand. My porn blogging friends aren’t crying about their loss of revenue.

    Comment by Bernie Goldbach
    21.
    January 12, 2010
    4:57 pm

    When you guys mentionned cycles, it put me in mind of this bit of business geekery. However, it could well be the most apt way of representing the phenomenom under discussion.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle

    Welcome to the Trough of Disillusionment!

    Comment by JD
    22.
    January 12, 2010
    5:01 pm

    Andrew – interesting point – though surely the recession would mean MORE blogging if people have time on their hands?

    Bernie – exactly. As the post above says, the readers haven’t gone away, even if some regular bloggers have skedaddled to pastures new. In fact, the less active the volume of blogs, the more readers to go around for the blogs which remain in regular update mode. I would argue, though, that more reliable broadband is again just another tool – the quality of the blog is what really counts in the first instance.

    JD – lovely! I knew there was a term for it.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    23.
    January 12, 2010
    5:23 pm

    I’m unemployed right now and it seems to leave me with less to say, for some reason. When you’re working you’re engaging with the world on a greater level.

    Or something. Either way, there’s only so many posts I could write about Gilmore Girls and Countdown.

    Comment by Andrew
    24.
    January 12, 2010
    5:58 pm

    I don’t entirely disagree with Una’s blog post, even though I was irked by it. Blogging is changing, it’s true. But it’s just the quantity of blog posts that’s gone down, not the quality.

    Comment by Annie
    25.
    January 12, 2010
    6:10 pm

    ^ Er, that makes me sound like I DO agree with Una’s blog post, which I don’t.

    Obviously I need to ‘flex my writing muscles’ again.

    Comment by Annie
    26.
    January 12, 2010
    11:02 pm

    Jim, the Sunday Times article despite the headline that baldy said otherwise (ah but sure editors do that I hear to draw in the reader) appeared to me, on reading it at the time, to be more about why blogging in Ireland have never really got going rather than it was over.

    And I think it was that notion that more irked a wider bunch of people than the idea that Una said she was talking about which was that “the bulk of the Irish blogosphere, a mess of personal and pop culture musings, which appears to be falling apart”. And that’s not a bad thing at all, death to the blogosphere. More life to people just using the tech to communicate or whatever they are into doing. It’s just a piece of technology.

    Comment by Dan Sullivan
    27.
    January 13, 2010
    12:29 am

    Superb original post by Una. She got it in one with the horrendous backslapping. Irish bloggers are just Cairde Fianna Fail in drag. Cosy, smug pricks. With not a lot of intelligence or talent, it’s just connections.

    Great post. Tell it like it is.

    Comment by Thor Bridges
    28.
    January 13, 2010
    10:37 am

    Dan – It’s just a piece of technology

    that’s the point I made above! It’s about what you do with the technology, not the technology itself.

    Thor – good to see, all the same, that you have to use a blog to make your point. I see a great future for you as a blogger.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    29.
    January 13, 2010
    11:05 am

    @Jim – 28 – Ah James, the point is it’s ‘your’ blog (or rather Madam Geraldine’s) I’ve used.

    Irish bloggers are the new Official Ireland media (see Sarah Carey’s superb article in today’s IT on this) – whereby only some people are allowed criticise certain subjects, and never each other.

    Occasionally, we see this cosy concensus breaking down and somebody breaks the masonic code – for example by saying the ‘wrong’ thing about Donal Og Cusack (I believe he is some kind of football player in the south of Ireland?), leaving the rest of the lodge to shift from one foot to another, mumble about agreeing to disagree, and quickly moving on (in a virtual sense).

    And, frankly, trusting the bloggers own claims that traffic to their sites (eyeballs, whatever) is as strong as ever is about as wise as buying into government claims about economic ‘fundamentals’ being sound, estate agent research about house prices (still understated), and words of wisdom from economists in banks over the last few years. No credibility, wrong, and frankly they would say that, wouldn’t they?

    Perhaps my only surprise is that cadre of blogging twats haven’t gravitated to a place where their insights and talent would have a natural home – as ‘columnists’ in the Sunday Independent.

    But, James, please do keep up the good work and exposing these issues.

    Now, I must rush off to my meeting with Eoghan Harris.

    Comment by Thor Bridges
    30.
    January 13, 2010
    11:19 am

    Blimey Thor, you have a lot of aul’ chips on your shoulder. I think it’s best for your blood pressure that you desist from reading all blogs right away so the “cadre of blogging twats” doesn’t upset you in any way.

    I find it hugely funny that people are angry with blogs, as you obliviously are. There are 2 solutiions for this – (a) start your own blog (I’d happily read it) or (b) don’t read ‘em at all. Simple as that. Like any other media, no-one is forcing you to read them. They’re certainly not the “new official Ireland media” (unless I missed a memo about this – must check my spam folder).

    And also, I’ve just read Sarah Carey’s column and don’t know what the hell you are on about. Not a word about blogs there. Hello?

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    31.
    January 13, 2010
    11:36 am

    In fairness to Thor, he has a point. Irish blogging, for the most part, is an excellent example of group think.

    Of course, there are some fine exceptions.

    Comment by nerraw
    32.
    January 13, 2010
    11:39 am

    nerraw – of course, there are exceptions but I find the gross generalisations (“cadre of blogging twats”) to be hugely amusing.

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    33.
    January 13, 2010
    1:12 pm

    And, frankly, trusting the bloggers own claims that traffic to their sites (eyeballs, whatever) is as strong as ever is about as wise as buying into government claims about economic ‘fundamentals’ being sound, estate agent research about house prices (still understated), and words of wisdom from economists in banks over the last few years. No credibility, wrong, and frankly they would say that, wouldn’t they?

    They would if they were trying to protect revenue streams, perhaps, but then lying about it on Jim’s blog is not going to make any difference in that regard.

    Unless you’re highly precious and feel your reputation would be tainted by admitting you have less readers than before why would you bother?

    It’s only blogging.

    Comment by Twenty Major
    34.
    January 13, 2010
    1:12 pm

    And Cadre of Twats would be an excellent name for a band.

    Comment by Twenty Major
    35.
    January 13, 2010
    2:57 pm

    “Irish bloggers are just Cairde Fianna Fail in drag. Cosy, smug pricks. With not a lot of intelligence or talent, it’s just connections.”

    I met Twenty once, y’know. I have grown exponentially in power and influence with every day that has since passed.

    Comment by Andrew
    36.
    January 13, 2010
    4:21 pm

    I began writing my own music blog for many reasons and all of them personal

    - to try and keep my mind creatively sharp as I work in IT but I am looking to do a masters media/journalism as soon as I can

    - my work can be hectic for 1 hr and then dead for another hr so it keeps me busy

    - i love music and simply having a blog instills a sort of discipline in researching what gigs are going on, what new bands are appearing, album releases etc etc.

    - it’s fun!!

    I would agree that it was mostly “peercasting” when I began but i have had a decent bit of traffic to the blog which just makes it all the more fun!

    Comment by The G-Man
    37.
    January 13, 2010
    9:27 pm

    I keep a blog that can be loosely described as a ‘music’ blog – asleep on the compost heap, and from a personal point of view my repeat visitor stats have slowly risen (not to anything spectacular, mind you) over the entire time I’ve kept at it. So, I don’t think the consumers/audience for blogging are ‘dead’. However, I think that many of the original gang in Ireland who started blogging and gained a bit of a high profile through newspaper features, the blog awards, and all that malarky seem to have now run through a sort of cycle that ends in jadedness, falling out of love with the hobby (for that is all it is for most of us) and eventually quitting. Because of this, there is an illusion that Irish blogging is dead, an assertion that, as many pointed out here and on Una’s post, would only hold true if Irish blogging began and ended with that high-profile wave of bloggers in the first place.

    I don’t extensively read blogs, and have never really slotted comfortably into the ‘blogging community’ so to speak, but from as far as I can see there remains a bunch of highly regarded, well-written blogs which are going from strength to strength. Maybe because their writers don’t play obsessive link-tag with each other, their readership might not be in the high figures, but there is a solid readership out there, a readership for whom Irish blogging is very far from dead. There are also plenty of new blogs emerging, and from reading them, I get the feeling that there is perhaps a tendency to slow down and focus on the quality of writing in many of these – a point again raised before by commenters here as perhaps being a by-product of the fact alternative mediums such as twitter and tumblr are more suited for video/link/picture type posts.

    Irish blogging ain’t dead, it’s there waiting to be discovered by anyone prepared to turn over a few stones.

    Comment by Darragh
    38.
    January 13, 2010
    9:55 pm

    The only mistake the Sunday Times made was in the article title:

    “Irish Blogging Fundamentals Sound Say Irish Bloggers”

    We all know what that means…

    (Shurely shome mishtake, and you meant “Irish Blogging Fundamentals Sound Say Irish Blogging Fundaments”? Ed.)

    Comment by Thor Bridges
    39.
    January 14, 2010
    8:05 pm

    @Jim – 30.

    James, James, James… “Christ on a Bike” as Eoghan Harris said to me about these ‘bloggards’…

    Have the eyes gone? Come on, you’re a young man, hardly Smiley Bolger vintage. The mention of Official Ireland is in the second last paragraph of Ms Carey’s article. The principle, James, the principle….

    And the chip on the shoulder stuff? I think we’ve all heard that wearisome, ineffective, and early-school leaver, Official Ireland riposte before somewhere haven’t we? Why, yes – from the “fundamentals are sound” brigade! Hhmmm

    Blood pressure is actually quite low so the doctor tells me. Besides, venting the pent is in the Irish blood as Beckett alluded to.

    At this rate I might have to nominate you for a blog award. Two very good subjects to date (the telly comedy one and this).

    Now, excuse me while I meet Eamon Delaney for tea.

    Comment by Thor Bridges
    40.
    January 16, 2010
    8:07 pm

    Alas James, there is no privacy policy on the awards site, so I can’t nominate you this time.

    However, your blog is great for positing the questions others won’t ask, and then facilitating the responses others won’t stomach. Please keep it up and expose other issues.

    In general, this privacy/date protection issue is a problem with many Irish blogs, and it comes into play especially if any criticism is offered of the Official Ireland Bloggards. The result is the immediate looking up of your IP address or other expositional data by the FourSquare Mayor of Starbucks in the Dundrum shopping centre and its sharing with equivalent intellectuals.

    Online censorship, bulleying and harassment just doesn’t happen in China.

    End of discussion from me.

    Comment by Thor Bridges
    41.
    January 17, 2010
    3:32 pm

    Thor – I thank you most sincerely for even thinking of nominating me. In fact, I’m blushing. Simply knowing that a gentleman of your calibre is reading this little blog is good enough for me, to be honest.

    As regards the privacy/data protection issue you raise, I must admit this blog has had some fun in its early years by turning the tables on those who’ve used anonymous comments to attack others.

    However, as the blog has, uhm, “matured” (feel free to snigger), we welcome the fact that people in the music and media industries in particular have used OTR to anonymously raise questions and add to stories already in the public domain. Some of my best music business stories in ‘09, for instance, have come about in that way.

    Anyway, have a nice day in that downtown branch of Starbucks in Singapore that you are currently posting from……..

    Comment by Jim Carroll
    42.
    January 21, 2010
    3:48 pm

    Thor @29, of course the irony is that Sarah was a blogger before she worked in the Irish Times…

    Comment by paysan

    Comments on this article are now closed.


Search On The Record