Theresa May summons her cabinet to five-hour meeting on Tuesday

Next steps on Brexit to be discussed after rejection of alternative options on Monday night

Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow, who chose four options for debate on Monday. Photograph: Jessica Taylor/AFP/Getty Images

Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow, who chose four options for debate on Monday. Photograph: Jessica Taylor/AFP/Getty Images


Theresa May has called her cabinet to a five-hour meeting on Tuesday – more than three times the usual length – to discuss the next steps on Brexit following MPs’ latest round of indicative votes on alternatives to her deal. Ministers will meet in the morning for three hours without officials to discuss political options before meeting in their regular formation for two hours after lunch.

Conservative MPs were given a free vote in the indicative voting on Monday night, although cabinet ministers were told to abstain on all the options.

Speaker John Bercow chose four options for debate: a permanent customs union; common market 2.0 which would see Britain remaining in the single market and customs union; a confirmatory referendum on any deal approved by parliament; and a revocation of article 50 rather than leaving with no deal if the EU refuses to delay Brexit further.

MPs rejected all four options, though the customs union proposal lost by just three votes.

Labour whipped its MPs to vote for all the options apart from the revocation of article 50, declaring that it was seeking a compromise that could win a majority in parliament.

“In line with our policy, we’re supporting motions to keep options on the table to prevent a damaging Tory deal or no-deal, build consensus across the House to break the deadlock and deliver an outcome that can work for the whole country,” a party spokesman said.


A special investigation on Brexit & the Border Read More

Not fulfil criteria

DUP Brexit spokesman Sammy Wilson said his party could not support any of the motions because they did not fulfil the criteria of protecting Northern Ireland’s place in the United Kingdom and delivering on the 2016 referendum result.

“The EU have made it quite clear that where there is uncertainty, they will require that the backstop be in place and indeed the withdrawal agreement makes it clear that even if the backstop were to be removed it could be in all or in part,” he said.

“Tonight, we will not be supporting any of these amendments; one, because they do not safeguard the issue of the Union, and two, because they do not deliver on Brexit.”

While MPs debated the procedure for the indicative votes, a group of seminaked climate change protesters glued themselves to the glass panel separating the public gallery from the Commons chamber. Police officers removed the demonstrators after about 30 minutes and the protest did not interrupt the debate.

Second referendum

Conservative Dominic Grieve, who advocates a second referendum, warned MPs against choosing a course of action that would see Britain leaving the EU within a few weeks after a short extension to article 50.

“I think the House has got to be very careful about simply jumping on something which it thinks we can all agree with without thinking through the consequence of the process. And making sure that process can satisfy the House itself and the electorate, and lead to the right outcome,” he said.

EU leaders meet in Brussels on April 10th and Britain will leave without a deal two days later unless MPs back a Brexit deal or Theresa May requests a long extension, which requires the unanimous approval of all member states.

Softer Brexit

In an interview broadcast on the BBC on Monday night, chief whip Julian Smith said the outcome of the 2017 general election made a softer Brexit inevitable.

“The thing that people forget is that the Conservative Party went to get a majority in order to deliver Brexit [and] failed to get a majority,” he said.

“The government as a whole probably should just have been clearer on the consequences of that. The parliamentary arithmetic would mean that this would be inevitably a softer type of Brexit.”

BREXIT: The Facts

Read them here