UK offered six-month Brexit extension as talks go on late into night
Change in article 50 deadline will be reviewed in June as Macron blocks longer delay
The debate on the duration of the extension went on late into the night, with most countries favouring a longer extension, according to sources briefed on the talks. The French president Emmanuel Macron held out, and leaders eventually agreed on the October 31st date after a marathon negotiating session which concluded after 1am.
While the UK will not now leave the EU on Friday evening, some leaders remained unconvinced that a no-deal departure is ruled out in the medium term. Others hope the extension allows time for the UK to ratify the Withdrawal Agreement and potentially commit to a customs union with the EU. Under the agreement reached on Wednesday, progress will be reviewed by EU leaders in June.
The UK prime minister appeared before leaders of the 27 remaining EU states early Wednesday evening to make substantially the case she had made in her letter to European Council president Donald Tusk last week.
She insisted any extension would have to allow the UK to leave as soon as agreement was reached in the House of Commons on withdrawal. Speaking earlier to Tory MPs, she said her own departure would not happen until then.
“What is important is that any extension enables us to leave at the point at which we ratify a withdrawal agreement,” she told journalists, making clear that she was not wedded to her proposed June 30th departure date.
Mrs May hopes to finalise a deal before European elections on May 23rd, allowing her to cancel them in the UK. Leaders were adamant that, if the UK is still a member after that date and has not participated in the elections, the UK will leave the union with a no-deal on June 1st. Mrs May insisted to sceptical leaders that talks with the Labour Party were going “very well”.
In a bid to encourage those discussions, Taoiseach Leo Varadkar floated the idea of a new customs union involving the EU and the UK, which would give the UK a say in new trade deals – interpreted as an attempt to get around the objection that the UK would have no say in decision-making if it stayed in the existing EU customs union.
Mrs May, responding to concerns – particularly from the French that the UK could be disruptive to EU decision-making if it remained a member for long – reiterated assurances that the UK would act in a spirit of “sincere co-operation”.
The French were looking for stronger assurances of “good behaviour”, specifically a promise not to wield vetoes in the ongoing multiannual budget discussions and appointments to top jobs. But others were confident vetoes could be circumvented if used, a position reiterated in the draft conclusions, which stressed the right of the 27 to meet together as 27.
Mr Varadkar said conditions that restricted a member state’s rights were not legally enforceable.
The debate on the duration of the extension, which took place over the leaders’ working dinner, favoured closure in December 2019. Mr Macron, however, strongly urged an October date and held out.
Separately, DUP leader Arlene Foster on Wednesday night accused British prime minister Mrs May of trying to force people into backing her Brexit deal.
Ms Foster described Mrs May’s approach to Brexit as “weak” and damaging to the UK. She made the comments ahead of her meeting with EU chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier on Thursday.
Ms Foster will be joined by Northern Ireland MEP Diane Dodds as well as Conservative MPs Iain Duncan Smith and Owen Paterson at Thursday’s meeting.
“This is a useful opportunity to once again set out why we oppose the withdrawal agreement and urge the EU’s chief negotiator to acknowledge the concerns of those we represent in Northern Ireland by making the changes outlined by parliament on January 29th.
“We want to see a sensible deal which works for every part of the United Kingdom and respects the referendum result. However, we cannot settle for a deal which would undermine the economic and constitutional integrity of the United Kingdom.”
The DUP adamantly oppose the backstop insurance policy for the Northern Ireland border, which they believe would redraw the border with the EU down the Irish Sea.
Ms Foster added: “The European Union has spoken much about protecting the peace process and the Belfast Agreement but has consistently ignored the views of unionists who do not want a new border erected between Northern Ireland the rest of the UK.
“Despite the prime minister being warned about the opposition to her withdrawal agreement, she has limped along and tried to force people into a cul-de-sac where they have no option but to support her deal.
“That is a weak approach and demeans the strength of this great nation. It is also foolish as it traps the UK and burdens future generations with a bad deal.” – Additional reporting: Agencies