Environment group launches legal challenge over ‘alien’ tree species planting
Save Leitrim Group claims decision to allow Sitka Spruce to be grown on site should be quashed
Such developments can adversely impact on the local environment, ecosystems and wildlife, the group claims. Photograph Nick Bradshaw
An environmental protection group has launched a High Court challenge against a decision to allow what it claims is an “alien species” of tree to be planted at a site in Co Leitrim.
The action has been brought by the Save Leitrim Group (Save Leitrim Environmental and Biodiversity Group CLG), which claims the decision to allow Sitka Spruce to be grown at a forestry development on a 13.3-hectare site at Meenymore, Dromohair, Co Leitrim is flawed and should be quashed.
The group says it has brought the action over its deep concerns about the “monoculture planting” of Sitka Spruce within Co Leitrim. It claims Sitka Spruce developments can completely obliterate landscapes over a very wide area.
These developments can completely remove cultural landscapes, and leave large tracts of afforested lands which are dark, foreboding and eliminate all life on the forest floor.
Such forests provide a higher commercial return than agriculture in the area, meaning that local people cannot compete with forestry when it comes to building up sustainable farms sizes that could provide a reasonable standard of living, it claims.
Such developments can also adversely impact on the local environment, ecosystems and wildlife, the group claims.
The site, which it says is in a particularly scenic location, is close to two protected sites, or Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Lough Gill and Boleybrack Mountain.
It claims a decision to allow the forestry development go ahead was appealed to the Forestry Appeal Committee which last May approved the development.
The group in its action says the committee erred in arriving at its decision in several respects.
It claims the screening and assessment of the site to see if the development would have any significant effects on the environment by the committee was neither appropriate nor in accordance with EU requirements.
The committee also failed to consider the characteristics of the proposed development, including its size, relationship with other developments, pollution and other nuisances, it claims.
In addition, the group says the development’s potential impacts on the existing population was not properly considered and that the committee failed to consider its submissions in that regard.
It claims a public notice in relation to the proposed forest development was neither visible nor legible from the public road, and failed to give adequate notice in respect of the development.
In its judicial review proceedings against the Forestry Appeal Committee, Ireland and the Attorney General, the group seeks an order quashing the committee’s decision.
The Save Leitrim Group also seeks several declarations including that committee has failed to comply with various EU directives including the habitats and screening directives.
It further seeks declarations that the State has failed to transpose various EU directives and regulations into domestic Irish laws including the Agriculture Appeals Act, the 2014 Forestry Act and the 2017 Forestry Regulations.
The action was briefly mentioned before the High Court last week, and was adjourned to a date in November.