Qatar World Cup bid organisers reject bribery claims

‘These allegations are ... designed to tarnish the reputation of Qatar’s 2022 Bid Committee’

A member of Qatar’s delegation (R) votes during the 65th FIFA Congress, held ahead of the 2014 World Cup, in Sao Paulo last week. Photograph: Paulo Whitaker/Reuters

A member of Qatar’s delegation (R) votes during the 65th FIFA Congress, held ahead of the 2014 World Cup, in Sao Paulo last week. Photograph: Paulo Whitaker/Reuters


The organisers of Qatar’s bid to host the 2022 World Cup have denied allegations published by a British newspaper that a senior Qatari soccer official made payments in order to win support for the bid.

In a robust defence of its campaign to host the world’s biggest sporting event, Qatar 2022 criticised the allegations of corruption that have overshadowed the buildup to the Brazilian tournament, which began on Thursday.

“These allegations are baseless and riddled with innuendo designed to tarnish the reputation of Qatar’s 2022 Bid Committee, ” organisers said.

They added that the allegations appeared to be deliberately timed to coincide with an investigation by Fifa, world soccer’s governing body, into the bidding process for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. Russia won the right to host the 2018 tournament.

Michael Garcia, the US lawyer leading the inquiry, said in Brazil this week that he would consider any evidence brought before him before releasing a final report. If corruption was proved, Qatar could be stripped of the cup, or at least face a challenge to its position as host either through a re-vote or other processes.

“It should be clear that these leaks are not an attempt to shine light on the 2018/2022 bidding process,” the Qatari statement said. “They are, instead, a flagrant attempt to prejudice an ongoing independent investigation.

“Certainly, if the source of these leaks were genuinely concerned with the evidence, they would have provided the leaked documents to Mr Garcia, as he requested, instead of offering them to the media.”

The Sunday Times reported recently that some of the “millions of documents” it had seen linked payments by former Fifa executive committee member Mohamed Bin Hammam to officials to win backing for Qatar’s World Cup bid.

Mr Bin Hammam has not commented on his involvement since he was banned for life from soccer in 2012.

The Qatar 2022 statement confirmed that it had a “relationship” with Mr Bin Hammam, but repeated earlier denials that he was a part of the official bid team.

“Let us be clear: Mr Bin Hammam is from Qatar, but he was not a member of Qatar’s bid team.”

“We have nothing to hide ... In every aspect of the 2018/2022 Fifa World Cup bidding process, we strictly adhered to Fifa’s rules and regulations.”

Qatar 2022 said it expected further “attacks” on the bid process this weekend, a reference to a series of articles that have appeared in the Sunday Times about the buildup to the 2010 decision on who should host the 2018 and 2022 World Cups.

Yesterday, the newspaper released details of its latest report, in which it said Fifa bosses had been warned in a “secret terror briefing” prior to the 2010 vote that there was a “high risk” of a terrorist attack shutting down the event.

It said Fifa’s executive committee (Exco) was briefed on the report written by Andre Pruis, the South African police chief in charge of security at the 2010 World Cup.

While other bid nations were assessed as low to moderate, Mr Pruis concluded: “In view of the risks ... Qatar is allocated a risk rating of high. I am of the view that it would be very difficult to deal with a major incident in such an environment without having to cancel the event.”

The report came out shortly after the Qatar 2022 statement was released. A spokesman for the organisers said he had no comment on the latest report.

The selection of Qatar as host country for the World Cup saw many eyebrows raised. Many wondered why it had gone to a country with a population of 2 million people, with little soccer heritage and where summer temperatures average 40 degrees Celsius (104 Fahrenheit).

Fifa’s own inspection team, which examined all the bids in forensic detail following site visits during 2010, advised decision-makers not to back Qatar citing mainly the summer heat.

Fifa boss Sepp Blatter said last month it had been “a mistake” to award the finals to the country in the summer due to the heat, but later said his quote in French had been mistranslated.

Qatar 2022 addressed the issue of the heat in its statement.

“We developed cooling technology to cope with the climate of the Middle East, technology that would prove enormously valuable for nations in similar climates around the world,” it said.

Organiders also said they had introduced better welfare standards for workers involved in constructing the infrastructure to host the event, following separate media reports of poor labour conditions.

“We are already constructing three stadiums and by the end of the year two more will be in development,” they said.

“Our country has demonstrated its support, spending more than $23 billion on transport infrastructure projects alone. And to be clear - we will do this as we advance worker welfare within Qatar.”

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.