European leaders call on Blatter to stand down as Fifa president

Events in Sao Paulo appear to set stage for Uefa president Michel Platini to enter the race

Locals while away the hours on Rio’s Ipanema Beach before the start of the greatest sports show on earth tomorrow. Photograph: Getty Images

Locals while away the hours on Rio’s Ipanema Beach before the start of the greatest sports show on earth tomorrow. Photograph: Getty Images

Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 17:37

It may still look like being more of a one-horse race than the tournament that gets under way here tomorrow, but Sepp Blatter’s bid for re-election got a little more interesting yesterday in Sao Paulo, where representatives of a couple of Europe’s most prominent associations made clear on the first day of Fifa’s Congress that they believe it is time for the veteran Swiss to go.

The Europeans, who included England’s FA chairman Greg Dyke and its Uefa Executive Committee (ExCo) member David Gill, and Dutch federation chief Michael van Praag (also a member of Uefa’s ExCo), all roundly criticised the Fifa president.

While Lennart Johansson, the former Uefa president who was beaten by Blatter in an election for Fifa’s top job back in 1998, said having promised three years ago that he would not run again, his old rival should now accept that “16 years are enough”.

Racism

The row follows on from Blatter’s comments on Monday when, without naming anyone, he suggested the current coverage in the British media of the vote to award Qatar the 2022 World Cup contained much “discrimination and racism”.

He said those behind it wanted to destroy Fifa.

The African federation, some of whose most prominent members have been implicated in the reporting of the Qatar vote, raised the stakes somewhat by passing a motion in which they described some of the allegations as “deliberately hateful, defamatory and degrading”.

Gill was slightly more reserved, describing Blatter’s determination to run for yet another term of office as “disappointing”. Dyke insisted Blatter’s comments had been “totally unacceptble”. He reported afterwards that he had told Blatter, at a meeting from which the media was excluded: “The allegations being made are nothing to do with the racism, they are allegations about corruption.”

Most damning, it seems, was van Praag, who told journalists afterwards that he had presented Blatter with a stark assessment of his performance in office.

Corruption

Von Praag said he had told Blatter in the meeting: “If you look at Fifa’s reputation over the last seven or eight years, it is being linked to all kinds of corruption and all kinds of old-boys’-networks things.

“Fifa has an executive president, and you are not making things easy for yourself, and I do not think you are the man for the job any longer,” he continued.

Von Praag said he told Blatter: “I like you very much . . . this is nothing personal. But you are now saying that Qatar was the wrong choice [for the 2022 World Cup], but you are not blaming yourself, you are blaming your executive committee.

“Yesterday you said something about racism against Qatar, and people are not taking you seriously any more. This is not good for Fifa and it is not good for the game.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.