Hold the backpage

Sat, Dec 8, 2012, 00:00

Compiled by PHILIP REID

Time for Tomic to tame down

Tennis loves a bad boy and by far the most interesting character on the professional circuit at the moment is a man who isn’t winning any titles . . . and who won’t be picked by his country for their opening Davis Cup match next year.

Nobody doubts Bernard Tomic, a 20-year-old Australian, has plenty of ability; it’s just he is making the headlines Down Under for all the wrong reasons, with stories about driving infringements (including being fined for joyriding in a V8-powered BMW M3 last month) and of partying and enjoying the good life.

Tomic’s world ranking has seen him fall from number 27 earlier in the year to a current low of 52nd with the result Davis Cup captain Pat Rafter has dropped him from the Australian team for February’s match with Taiwan.

Rafter has shown his cut-throat captaincy in the recent past, omitting Marinko Matosevic – the Australian number one – for an encounter with Germany in September after the latter lost interest in a previous dead-rubber match with a South Korean earlier in the year. A contrite Matosevic has since returned to the fold.

Tomic would do well to listen to the advice of last year’s women’s US Open champion Sam Stosur who asked, “What are you doing? ” adding: “He’s got this unbelievable tennis ability and he’s not really using it at the moment.”

Bernard, listen to the woman!

Poulter proof that competitive spirit prevails

It is always intriguing when an elite sportsperson reacts to something that gets under their skin. Ian Poulter – whoever would have thought it, but more of a role model as days go by – was at it in midweek and didn’t hold back in succinctly offering his opinion on how competitive sport (or the lack of it) features in the British schools system.

Not surprisingly, given he is a dab hand when it comes to the social media vehicle, Ian James Poulter used the medium of Twitter to let us know of his angst.

“This thing in British schools is total crap, non-competitive sport. Not scoring, not telling kids who’s won because it discriminates. BS,” tweeted the multi-millionaire golfer from his expansive new house in Florida which is only six months old but already has the builders back on site to extend a garage flush with Ferraris.

Poulter is no sports psychologist, nor is he a sociologist. He is, however, a sportsman who has excelled in his profession and, probably more importantly, also a family man who clearly adores his children and wants to instil his own sporting competitiveness into them. His point of view, however succinct, is a worthy one; even if his own children will be brought up in a US schools system where state-of-the-art sporting facilities will be part and parcel of their education as they go from middle to high school and, presumably, on to the collegiate system.

The stance adopted by Poulter is not new. On the night of Europe’s Ryder Cup comeback win over the USA in Medinah in September, Poulter – when asked about why his eyes almost popped out of his head with intensity in his desire to win – responded: “In every form of sport I played [growing up], whether I was playing football, whether I was playing pool, whatever I was doing I was really competitive. My dad ingrained it in me, he always told me to play to win. I’m a bad loser. My dad’s a bad loser. That’s why I’m hard to play against in matchplay, and why guys dislike me and want to beat me.”

Poulter’s pointed remarks were aimed at the British schools system, where there is an ongoing debate about the merits or not of competitive sporting structures in the aftermath of the Olympic Games.

What’s more important? To have everyone playing sport, especially a team sport; or to focus on participation and fitness? When is too young to start? How do you counter the significant drop-out rates (a worldwide problem) of teenagers? Do you have a system where there are formal competitive matches? Or not?

It’s a debate that has been held in meeting rooms the world over. Indeed, getting the balance right is something that has proven difficult for different sporting administrators and schools and clubs.

When is too much too much?

Here, we all know about the early morning training sessions before school starts in the run-up to the various cup competitions in rugby. We know of training camps undertaken by GAA clubs in the quest for the Féile na Peil.

But, then, sport at the sharp end is all about competition and Poulter’s view will strike home with the majority of players and coaches who take their sport, at whatever level, seriously. He is talking of experience on the matter.

“When anybody tells me I’m not good enough, that becomes the motivation,” he told us on that night in Chicago.

“I had that in a number of things. At school. At football. And it fuels me. I might not have been born with the talent of some people but I’ve got quite a big heart and I’m prepared to go out on the line . . . in football, I always wanted to be the guy that scored the goal. I like to give it 100 per cent. If I go down, I’m going down in flames.”

Such language strikes a motivational chord with many sportspeople. To others, it provides the reason why children should be protected from competition until they are older. It does seem bizarre to have sporting activities where there are no winners and no losers.

Sport is about winning, and accepting defeat. It’s about instilling humility in the winner, for sure.

But where would sport be if there were no scores?

No results.

No winners. Or losers.

Poulter – rejected after a 10-minute trial by Spurs in his own youth – is living proof of that. The competitive spirit will always win out.

Lennon tunes in to Parkhead penalty pointer

Celtic manager Neil Lennon has been taking some stick for turning his back, burying his head in his coat and refusing to watch the penalty scored by Kris Commons that gave the Glasgow giants a place in the knock-out stage of the Champions League and a financial windfall.

Lennon shouldn’t have to apologise to anyone; his decision to turn his back showed just how much the club means to him.

What better way to see a goal than to listen to a packed Parkhead erupt?

And, anyway, he’s shown his toughness through the years, as a hard-tackling midfielder for the club and, unfortunately, in coping with sectarian death threats.

Give him a break!

Counties geared up for Christmas pitch but Cork still searching for a sponsor

Most GAA clubs and county boards around the country are more thankful than ever in these economic climes that the proposal instigated in the early-1990s by Dublin club Crumlin to allow logos appear on jerseys was passed.

The logos originally allowed on jerseys were so small they were barely legible but have moved with the times (as the new Tayto Park sponsorship on Meath jerseys shows) and, surely, it is only a matter of time before secondary logos are allowed on shoulders or the backs of jerseys as clubs and counties seek additional revenue.

For Cork, the search for a sponsor to succeed O2 hasn’t materialised in time to launch a new jersey for the lucrative Christmas market. With Dublin – in the middle of a six-year deal with Vodafone – launching a new jersey and Waterford’s deal with 3 going strong, Cork could do with getting a call with a friendly voice at the end of the line.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.