Why can’t Clare simply accept defeat?

Acknowledging on one hand that opponents were better but on the other trying to undermine the referee is unacceptable

Clare’s manager Davy Fitzgerlad reacts during his side’s Munster Senior Hurling Championship semi-final defeat to Cork at Semple Stadium on June 15th. Photograph: Inpho.

Clare’s manager Davy Fitzgerlad reacts during his side’s Munster Senior Hurling Championship semi-final defeat to Cork at Semple Stadium on June 15th. Photograph: Inpho.

Wed, Jun 18, 2014, 09:00

It is turning into a stressful summer for hurling referees. Tipperary’s Johnny Ryan had charge of what may well have been the last Anthony Nash penalty and his application of a curious new interpretation – unbeknown to all apart, apparently, from an inner circle of referees and administrators – created such a furore that a new interpretation duly followed.

Effectively changing rules a few weeks into a season is no-one’s idea of best practice but in the circumstances it had to be done.

Worse was to follow for Westmeath’s James McGrath, who has been in the wars over the past two seasons.

He might have felt that he was due an uneventful championship after last year’s travails when having red carded Cork’s Patrick Horgan in the Munster final against Limerick, his decision was overturned, albeit on debatable grounds.

There were well meaning suggestions flying around – not from Cork – that he shouldn’t be considered for Cork matches, as he would find himself “under pressure”. There are so few elite referees that it would hardly be practical to prevent them from taking charge of matches involving counties in one of whose past matches the official had made a contentious decision.

Then again, top GAA referees put up with an awful lot.

In Sunday’s match McGrath had to put up with abuse from the crowd and remonstrations from Clare even at half-time. A first-half free count of 12-5 in Cork’s favour was adduced as if prima facie evidence that some wrong had been done.

Reasons for disgruntlement

Clare may have had had some reasons for disgruntlement in that Cork appeared to get some of their frees more easily and it wasn’t McGrath’s most convincing performance but a referee’s perception is something that both teams are meant to buy into before the match starts.


The barrage of implicit criticism and mealy-mouthed insinuation that followed the match was however unacceptable.

A year ago, after Cork had also beaten Clare in the Munster semi-final Davy Fitzgerald was asked was he unhappy with a concussion injury to John Conlon. He replied: “I’m unhappy with more than that. If you say anything you’re going to be accused of not taking a beating so I’m going to leave it but I won’t be leaving it when I get a chance to correct it properly with the people that matter. I’ll be talking to someone because I’m not happy with a certain amount of things.

“I’m not going to criticise anyone or say anything bad about anyone. I’ll deal with that myself in my own private manner. The most important thing today, we acknowledge that Cork were the better team and fair play to them. They won the game fairly and squarely.”

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.