Something had to be done on ‘Anthony Nash’ rule to avoid further flashpoints

‘I think there’s a real need to look at this from the perspective of safety’

A photo-montage of Cork goalkeeper Anthony Nash scoring from a penalty during an Allianz League match against Tipperary earlier this season. Photograph: James Crombie/Inpho.

A photo-montage of Cork goalkeeper Anthony Nash scoring from a penalty during an Allianz League match against Tipperary earlier this season. Photograph: James Crombie/Inpho.

Tue, Jun 10, 2014, 01:00

I’m relieved by the news that this situation is to be looked at by the GAA’s management committee. I’d acknowledge that although goalkeepers have been taking penalties for a long time there was a particular excitement – and extraordinary skill – about Anthony Nash’s frees: coming up the field in last year’s All-Ireland finals and Clare lining the goals with the new hurleys added an amazing entertainment value.

But I also know that I wouldn’t like to be on the goal-line myself and would want more protection than a helmet if I was. Players on the line need additional protective equipment, like the box in cricket. I think there’s a real need to look at this from the perspective of safety, especially in under-age hurling where I really believe there’s danger.

I’m watching very young teams playing games in Dublin and everyone’s trying that technique. They generally can’t manage it but the most talented kid will hit maybe one in 10 but if he does hit someone on the line in an exposed place – which can easily happen particularly as those on the line mightn’t be the most adept and they may even just be there for the day – that’s the danger.

Sunday’s chaos in Thurles took it to a new level. There had to be clarification because the reality is if you’re allowed to charge a 20-metre free-taker or penalty-taker why can’t you charge every free-taker?

It’s only a question of finding someone quick enough over 20 metres to get in a block or maybe even a hook. If you’re going to deem that a touch on the hurley is the commencement of the strike you’re nearly better off on a normal 20-m free – there are stated encroachment restrictions pre-strike for those outside the line for penalties – to come from behind and hook him.

Nobody has ever taken that interpretation before. If you’re going to tolerate that interpretation for penalties and 20-metre frees you are going to have to tolerate it for all frees.

For me the solution is that any free or penalty must be struck before or on the 20-metre line. Because a penalty is a serious sanction I’d have it so that just the goalkeeper could be on the line, something I think goalkeepers would welcome and which would preserve the entertainment value.

Something had to be done and quickly with more potential flashpoints this weekend.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.