About-turn on Ahern lacked independent thinking


ANNE HARRIS, the editor of the Sunday Independent, had a cheesy piece in that newspaper on Sunday extolling the scrupulousness of the O’Reillys in maintaining a strict demarcation between their corporate interests and the editorial independence of editors.

The article began with an account of a lavish party at the O’Reilly Kildare mansion. “The invitation list was that eclectic mix that made a social gathering sing – pop stars, legal eagles, chat show hosts, editors, DJs, foreign presidents, finance mandarins, taoisigh past and present”. There was “a Gatsby glimmer”, she gushed.

Did she not recall that one of Denis O’Brien’s early and telling critiques of the O’Reillys was about the funding of just such bashes at the expense of Independent News and Media (INM) – ie using the funds of the shareholders for vanity revelries?

And did she wonder at all whether the presence of all these important glitzy people had anything to do with the O’Reilly media power and how it was used?

Anne Harris’s main point was that among the guests that Saturday night was Bertie Ahern and how there could have been a temporary embarrassment, for copies of the following morning’s Sunday Independent were on view and the lead story was a demand that Ahern resign. Tony O’Reilly, then the chief executive at INM, was unfazed. “Editorial was independent,” she asserted.

Curious that.

The first 3½ months of 2007, the year of a general election in May, the Sunday Independent engaged in a characteristically choreographed agenda – targeting Ahern and the Fianna Fáil-led government.

On January 7th, 2007, on page one, was an opinion piece by columnist Brendan O’Connor, speculating what the media reaction would be had Enda Kenny received a load of money from businessmen while he was minister for finance (as Ahern had done).

Inside was a story headed, “Bertie snubs Miriam in Who’s Who” – Miriam being Ahern’s estranged wife.

There was another piece on jobbery and State boards, and an editorial on how the taxpayers were conned for the third time by the Ahern-led government.

On January 14th, 2007, the newspaper highlighted a poll revealing nearly two-thirds of the electorate did not believe Ahern when he protested he would not form a government dependent on Sinn Féin support.

On February 11th a story on the thousands of euro of public monies being spent to fund media monitoring for Ahern.

On February 18th a lead story on how Fianna Fáil feared Ahern had “blundered” over election. On March 4th a headline: “Bertie sinks as house market goes under.”

On March 25th the headline: “Fianna Fáil resorts to auction politics to woo voters.” On April 1st: “Bertie U-turn wrong-foots ministers.”

Inside a story on how a close associate of Ahern made a fortune in 24 hours. On April 8th: “Ahern missed boat on election” and inside another headline: “Will Bertie’s new Haughey gene cost FF the next election?”On April 15th: “Ahern denies air trip with a case of cash” (on a trip to Manchester in 1995).

But then, suddenly, there was a compete volte-face. And no explanation.

On April 22nd, 2007, there was an exclusive facilitatory interview with Ahern on stamp duty “reform”.

On April 29th the Sunday Independent had an exclusive on the date of the election, supplied by their new pal Ahern. And, for good measure, it had another exclusive interview with Ahern, by the paper’s then editor, the late Aengus Fanning.

In the course of this there was not a single difficult question. Not a word about his personal finances, instead facilitatory stuff about inflation, stamp duty reform, health, Sinn Féin, Northern Ireland. Just one question about the Mahon tribunal: “Do you think the tribunal is worth the money?”, to which Ahern replied: “As I’m involved, I’d better say nothing.”

On May 6th, 2007, a front page story under the headline: “Most voters want Bertie as Taoiseach despite money issues.” On May 13th there was another interview with Ahern in which he spoke about his personal finances under the headline: “It’s all related to my judicial separation.” There was no challenge to his claims.

On May 20th, 2007, the Sunday before the election, the headline was: “Bertie boosted in poll – blow for Fine Gael.” Another headline on the front page: “Media tried to scupper Bertie, claims loyal Miriam” (a reference to Ahern’s former wife) and inside: “Ahern personal finances not an election issue.”

So how come this spectacular turnaround? This could all be a compete coincidence, of course, but during the week that the extraordinary U-turn was undertaken – this was the week beginning April 16th, 2007 – a private undisclosed meeting took place between Tony O’Reilly and Ahern, accompanied by Brian Cowen.

At a Fianna Fáil press conference during that election campaign, Cowen was asked about that meeting. He confirmed the meeting had taken place and refused to state what was discussed.

But the extraordinary feature of that was that immediately following the meeting the Sunday Independent changed its tack 100 per cent on Ahern and we are asked to believe that “editorial was independent”.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.