Preventing war ‘is 60 times cheaper than fighting it’
Threat of US strikes may have been averted, but war goes on
Forces loyal to Syria’s president Bashar al-Assad carry the national flag as they ride on motorcycles in Qusair. Photograph: Mohammed Azakir/Reuters
Sometimes Twitter is not just a cesspit full of people who love to hate. Last week, Nigerian-American novelist Teju Cole tweeted his take on John Kerry’s proposal to put chemical weapons in Syria beyond use.
Kerry: We won’t attack . . . if you do this impossible thing.
Syria: Oh? We’ll do it.
Russia: They’ll do it.
UN: They’ll do it.
It may be amusing, but what is far from funny is that the threat of US strikes has been averted but the deadly war goes on with no sign of abating.
It is an incredibly complex situation, with no viable “goodies” clearly visible. Just ask the residents of Maaloula, a Syrian Christian village, one of only three sites in the world where they still speak Aramaic, the language of Jesus.
Reports from the area are confused, but according to the BBC’s Jeremy Bowen last week, rebels were still engaging in battle with government troops and pro-government militia, while most of the residents had fled.
As the BBC commented, “Many [Christians] fear that if the secular government is overthrown they will be targeted by Sunni jihadist rebels calling for the establishment of an Islamic state and that Christian communities will be destroyed, as many were in Iraq after the US-led invasion in 2003.”
Of course, it is not just Christians who are suffering in Syria, as the two million refugees who have poured over Syrian borders testify.
Until the proposal of putting chemical weapons beyond use emerged, “surgical strikes” or standing helplessly by were presented as the only possible responses.
Surgical strikes are of course a myth, as US experience with drones, which has included deaths of children, has shown.
The remotely controlled drones allow the US military and Central Intelligence Agency to follow someone for months and then, one day, death rains down from the sky.
The US classifies any male present at the site of a drone strike as a combatant, unless there is exonerating evidence, which explains why civilian death figures are not far higher.
Teju Cole also had a series of tweets about drones in which he adapted seven famous first lines from literature. Here’s Moby-Dick: “Call me Ishmael. I was a young man of military age. I was immolated at my wedding. My parents are inconsolable.”
Mark Bowden’s article in this month’s edition of the Atlantic, “The Killing Machines: How to Think about Drones” should be mandatory reading for anyone seeking to understand drone strikes.
Bowden describes a 19-year-old soldier continents away from Afghanistan controlling a drone with a joystick and a monitor, and watching a small US marine patrol that had come under fire unexpectedly. Using the appropriately named AGM-114 Hellfire missile, he targeted the truck that was attacking the marines, leaving only a smoking crater where four attacking militants had been.