Judge rejects New York’s stop-and-frisk policy
Mayor Bloomberg says he hopes appeal process will allow practice to continue
New York mayor Michael Bloomberg during a news conference after a federal judge ruled on a stop-and-frisk police practice in New York on Monday. Photograph: Kirsten Luce/The New York Times
A federal judge ruled on Monday that the stop-and-frisk tactics of the New York Police Department violated the constitutional rights of minorities in the city, repudiating a major element in the Bloomberg administration’s crime-fighting legacy.
The use of police stops has been widely cited by city officials as a linchpin of New York’s success in seeing major crimes fall to historic lows. The police say the tactic has saved the lives of thousands of young black and Hispanic men by removing thousands of guns from the streets.
But the judge, Shira Scheindlin, found the police department resorted to a “policy of indirect racial profiling” as it increased the number of stops in minority communities. That had led to officers routinely stopping “blacks and Hispanics who would not have been stopped if they were white”.
The judge called for a federal monitor to oversee broad reforms, including the implementation of body-worn cameras for some patrol officers, though she was “not ordering an end to the practice of stop and frisk”. In her 195-page decision, she concluded that the stops, which soared in number over the last decade as crime continued to decline, demonstrated a widespread disregard for the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, as well as the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg accused the judge of deliberately denying the city “a fair trial”, and said the city would file an appeal. Striking a defiant tone, Mr Bloomberg said, “You’re not going to see any change in tactics overnight.”
He said he hoped the appeal process would allow the current stop-and-frisk practices to continue through to the end of his administration because “I wouldn’t want to be responsible for a lot of people dying”.
Stopping without cause
The judge found that for much of the last decade, patrol officers had stopped innocent people without any objective reason to suspect them of wrongdoing. But her criticism went beyond the conduct of police officers.
“I also conclude that the city’s highest officials have turned a blind eye to the evidence that officers are conducting stops in a racially discriminatory manner,” she wrote, citing statements the mayor and the police commissioner, Raymond Kelly, have made in defending the policy.
Scheindlin ordered a number of remedies, including a pilot programme in which officers in at least five precincts across the city would wear cameras on their bodies to record street encounters. She also ordered a “joint remedial process” – in essence, a series of community meetings – to solicit public input on how to reform the department’s tactics.
The judge named Peter Zimroth, a partner in Arnold & Porter LLP and a former corporation counsel and prosecutor in the Manhattan district attorney’s office, to monitor the Police Department’s compliance with the US Constitution. The installation of a monitor will leave the department under a degree of judicial control that is certain to shape policing strategies under the next mayor.
– (New York Times)