Hungary under fire for tightening screw on asylum seekers and NGOs

Populist PM Viktor Orban accused of flouting international law and targeting critics

 Hungary’s prime minister Viktor Orban: Dismissed criticism of its asylum policy as “dreamy human rights gibberish”. Photograph: Kacper Pempel/Reuters

Hungary’s prime minister Viktor Orban: Dismissed criticism of its asylum policy as “dreamy human rights gibberish”. Photograph: Kacper Pempel/Reuters

 

Hungary is facing fierce criticism over new rules to detain all asylum seekers in closed border camps built of shipping containers, and plans to tighten state control over civil society groups that often challenge prime minister Viktor Orban.

Legislation passed by Hungary’s parliament this week will confine all refugees and migrants to camps for the entire duration of the asylum process, and empowers police to detain illegal migrants caught anywhere in Hungary and expel them to neighbouring Serbia without any legal recourse. Only unaccompanied children younger than 14 years of age will be exempt.

The measures tighten further a Hungarian asylum regime that human rights defenders say breaches the country’s international obligations to protect people fleeing war and persecution.

The new system will also deter the EU from allowing the return of asylum seekers to Hungary under the bloc’s so-called Dublin regulation - an outcome Mr Orban may welcome, having portrayed Europe’s mostly Muslim migrants and refugees as a danger to its security and identity.

Problematic situation

Nils Muznieks, the Council of Europe’s human rights commissioner, said on Wednesday that the measures were “likely to exacerbate the already highly problematic situation of asylum seekers in Hungary.

“Under the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, detention for the purpose of denying entry to a territory or for removal must be a measure of last resort . . . Automatically depriving all asylum seekers of their liberty would be in clear violation of Hungary’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.”

Gauri Van Gulik, Amnesty International’s deputy director for Europe, said: “Plans to automatically detain some of the world’s most vulnerable people in shipping containers behind razor wire fences, sometimes for months on end, are beyond the pale.

“We are urging the EU to step up and show Hungary that such illegal and deeply inhumane measures have consequences.”

During the height of Europe’s refugee crisis in 2015, Hungary built fences on its southern borders to block people moving along the “Balkan route” to western Europe.

Layer of fencing

Mr Orban’s government is now building a second layer of fencing, and he has dismissed criticism of its asylum policy as “dreamy human rights gibberish”. Officials have also rejected numerous reports of Hungarian police mistreating refugees and migrants that they detain.

At a swearing-in ceremony for border police this week, Mr Orban said Hungary was still “under siege” and that the crisis would persist “until people everywhere realise that migration is the Trojan horse of terrorism”.

Mr Orban’s populist Fidesz party is also expected to introduce a bill to parliament this month that would sharply increase financial scrutiny of foreign-funded NGOs in Hungary.

The main target of the bill appears to be liberal groups financed by Hungarian-born billionaire George Soros, some of which have worked since the 1990s to strengthen democracy, transparency and the rule of law in Hungary. They now often criticise Mr Orban over everything from asylum policy to widespread corruption.

Mr Orban himself predicted that 2017 “would be about squeezing out the forces symbolised” by Mr Soros. “One can feel it coming,” he said, “that each country will trace the source of this money, the connections [between NGOs] and intelligence communities, and which NGOs represent which interests.”

Goran Buldioski, director of Mr Soros’s Open Society Initiative for Europe, said Hungarian NGOs that criticise Mr Orban now face “a government PR campaign” to tarnish their reputation.

“We often hear comparisons with Russia, but Russia is not an EU member and doesn’t espouse democratic values as part of its society,” Mr Buldioski told The Irish Times.

“It’s very important that an EU member does not go down that same path.”