Wallace seeks to 'clarify' position


Independent TD Mick Wallace yesterday reasserted his intention not to resign from the Dáil, saying he is to seek permission to "clarify" his position over his under-declaration of VAT.

In a statement, the Wexford TD said he would write to Ceann Comhairle Seán Barrett tomorrow asking to be allowed to address TDs on Tuesday afternoon.

“My intention, for the sake of my constituents and civilians generally, is to clarify my position in relation to my taxation issues and how I propose to continue to serve them in Dáil Éireann,” said Mr Wallace. “Out of respect for the Ceann Comhairle, I will be making no further comment at this time.”

Mr Wallace’s construction firm - MJ Wallace Ltd – has made a €2.1 million settlement with the Revenue Commissioners arising from its failure of to make full tax returns on apartment sales over a two-year period.

Mr Wallace has said he believes that none of the money will be paid to Revenue because his company is insolvent and he is not personally liable.

Mr Wallace has been the subject of criticism from his fellow members of the Dáil technical group.

Earlier yesterday, Tipperary South Independent TD Seamus Healy called on Mr Wallace to resign from the Dáil. Mr Healy, of the Workers and Unemployed Action Group, an affiliate of the United Left Alliance, said in a statement his colleague's tax affairs “are completely and absolutely wrong and unacceptable”.

Mr Healy said Mr Wallace should pay his tax bill in full. “We cannot have double standards. There must not be one law for TDs and another for ordinary citizens,” he said. “I believe Deputy Wallace’s position is incompatible with his continued membership of Dáil Éireann and that he should resign.”

Under the agreement with Revenue, MJ Wallace was found to have underdeclared VAT liabilities on returns by €1,418,894. Interest came to €289,146 and penalties amounting to €425,668 were imposed, giving a total of €2,133,708.

Mr Wallace will find out next Wednesday whether he is to be investigated by fellow Dáil deputies. Arrangements were being made yesterday for a meeting of the Dáil Committee on Members’ Interests next week to examine the issues surrounding Mr Wallace’s tax non-compliance.

This followed a letter from Mr Barrett to the chairman of the committee, Independent TD Thomas Pringle, asking it to consider holding an investigation.

Mr Barrett said the Dáil Committee on Procedure and Privileges, which he chaired, had no function in the matter, whereas the members’ interests committee would appear to have the power to conduct an investigation under the legal framework provided under ethics legislation.

However, Mr Wallace may yet escape investigation by his peers, as Mr Pringle expressed doubt that his committee would have the powers to conduct an inquiry. He said that because Mr Wallace’s under-declaration of VAT occurred in 2008-2009, before he was elected to the Dáil, it may be outside of the remit of the committee to investigate the matter.

The committee would take legal advice before deciding what to do on Wednesday, said Mr Pringle, who is Mr Wallace’s colleague in the technical group.

On Friday, Independent TD Shane Ross said he believed the best thing Mr Wallace could do was to make a statement to the Dáil to explain his position, what had happened and what he intended to do.

Waterford deputy John Halligan said his colleague should initiate payments owed to Revenue “from whatever resources he has”.

United Left Alliance deputy Joan Collins said Mr Wallace was wrong, but said members of the technical group were not in a position to demand someone’s resignation. This was disputed by the Green Party, which claimed there was nothing to stop members asking Mr Wallace to stand down from membership of the group.

Socialist Party TD Joe Higgins said Mr Wallace’s place in the Dáil was a matter for the people of Wexford who elected him.

On RTÉ’s Today with Pat Kenny programme, Mr Higgins was asked whether it was appropriate that a self-confessed tax evader should also hold a role as a legislator. He said that what his technical group colleague had done was “off the wall, quite simply and quite straightforward”, adding if anyone got into such a difficulty with regard to tax they should go immediately to Revenue.

He rejected a suggestion from the presenter that if a similar issue had arisen in relation to a TD on the Government side of the Dáil he would be “jumping up and down” calling for a resignation.

Mr Higgins questioned whether Mr Wallace’s salary as a TD could be made liable for the tax owed in the same way an overpayment of social welfare would be deducted from a person’s weekly allowance.

Fianna Fáil called for an investigation by the committee on procedures and privileges. Chief whip Seán Ó Fearghaíl said TDs had a collective responsibility to ensure they behaved in a way that encouraged public confidence in the Oireachtas. “It is important that every member of the Oireachtas, regardless of prominence or party affiliation, be held to the same standard of probity and accountability,” he said.

Anti-corruption group Transparency International Ireland called for ethics laws to be widened so TDs and Senators would be required to submit tax clearance certificates for their companies in additional to individual filings.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.