Will Paddy Power come to regret its tasteless Pistorius ad? Don’t bet on it

Opinion: You might like to keep the names of companies that offend you on file

Sat, Mar 8, 2014, 00:01

Allow me to begin in cryptic fashion. At some point in the past few years, the producers of a low-budget film – made, we’ll admit, on this island – mailed journalists a selection of promotional items that seemed calculated to offend. That is, at least, the sensible interpretation. If it was not so intended then its senders were in serious need of sensitivity training.

What does one do? At least one radio show ran a story on the controversy that allowed the film-makers to express the classic non-apology apology: “We’re sorry if we caused any offence. That was not our intention.”

A UK national paper picked up the story. Suddenly, a film that would have had trouble attracting attention beyond a small corner of the review pages was registering beneath stories about wars and economic meltdowns. It is hard to avoid the suspicion that the film-makers were not all that sorry offence had been taken.

The temptation to run the story was close to irresistible. But, after consideration, I decided the best thing to do was to write as little as possible about the wretched film. If, at some point in the future, the incident popped up in, say, an op-ed column, then the veil of obscurity would remain draped over the movie’s title, personnel and marketing strategy. Not only must we ignore the story; we must not mention that we are ignoring the story (because then we’d be mentioning the story, you see).

All of which eventually bring us to the trigger for this unavoidably frustrating reminiscence. Earlier this week, the cheeky tipsters at Paddy Power got into trouble over an advertisement that acknowledged the firm was taking bets on the outcome of the Oscar Pistorius trial. Featuring a mock-up of the former athlete as an Academy Award, the ad promised that all punters who lost on the Oscars (check out the hysterical pun) will get “money back if he walks”.

Not a hoax
More than a few jaded social networkers assumed the advert must be a hoax. It wasn’t just that Paddy Power was using the death of a young woman – Pistorius is accused of murdering his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp – to generate profits; it was the staggeringly frivolous tone of the campaign. But real it was. As the week progressed, petitions were raised, columns were written and representatives of Paddy Power adopted stubbornly bullish positions.

“We’re offering a market on the outcome of a trial because people want to bet on it,” Cormac McCarthy, the firm’s chief financial officer, said. “We’ve had over a thousand people place bets on this. It is the story of the year.”

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.