PAC approach to Rehab was ‘lawmakers acting as lawbreakers’
Frank Flannery says role in Fine Gael was ‘not unrelated’ to pursuit by committee
Former Rehab chief executive and Fine Gael strategist Frank Flannery (right) has denied there was anything ‘cosy’ about a person with links to Fine Gael lobbying a Government of which the party was a member. Photographer: Dara Mac Dónaill/The Irish Times.
Former Rehab chief executive Frank Flannery has launched a stinging attack on the Oireachtas Public Accounts Committee, saying its behaviour in examining the organisation was an example of lawmakers acting as lawbreakers.
Mr Flannery, who was a long-time Fine Gael member and strategist, said the committee had been seeking headlines and pursuing vendettas under the cover of examining how money that went from the State to Rehab was spent. He accused committee members of attempting to run amok and of behaving in “an illegal and almost righteous fashion”.
“This committee was set upon a lawless path and they were attacking the rights of citizens under our constitution,” he told RTÉ’s Today with Seán O’Rourke programme. “They knew they were doing it and I believe it was widely known in the system that it was going on but nobody was shouting stop.”
Earlier this week, the Oireachtas Committee on Procedures and Privileges (CPP) told the PAC that it did not have the power to compel Mr Flannery or former Rehab chief executive Angela Kerins, who faced hours of questioning by members prior to her resignation, to appear before it.
The CPP said that because Rehab was not audited by the Comptroller & Auditor General, the PAC did not have the legal authority to examine how it used public monies.
Mr Flannery said the PAC had been told this by its own legal advisers, yet “they deliberately decided to go against their legal advice and to pursue their vendettas against people and organisations even though they knew it was unlawful”.
He added: “When lawmakers become lawbreakers the country is in a very dangerous situation and the Committee on Procedures and Privileges has done, in my opinion, parliament and the committee’s system a very necessary service in putting a halt to this particular gallop.”
Mr Flannery denied refusing to attend the committee, saying he had not been invited in. He said he wrote to the committee after hearing members “yelling at me over the radio morning, noon and night” asking what information they wanted from him and how that fits within PAC’s remit.
“That’s information which any witness to any committee is fully entitled to. I have never received a reply to that letter,” he said, adding that he would have been happy to go before the committee if his questions had been answered, but was now glad he took a stand.
Mr Flannery said the nature of questioning Ms Kerins was subjected to was unrelated to the contracts Rehab won from the State but rather an “incessant personal attack”.