Election Lexicon: Momentum

We translate jargon so you don’t have to

 Taoiseach Enda Kenny. The Government’s “momentum” has been halted with a drop in the latest ‘Irish Times’ poll. But does it even exist? Bu  Photograph: Colin Keegan, Collins Dublin

Taoiseach Enda Kenny. The Government’s “momentum” has been halted with a drop in the latest ‘Irish Times’ poll. But does it even exist? Bu Photograph: Colin Keegan, Collins Dublin

 

What does it usually mean?

The impetus gained by a moving object.

What does it mean in this election?

The theory that, if a candidate or party has gained ground in recent polls, that trend should continue in the next results. Known as “The Big Mo” in the US, it’s often deployed as a self-evident truth by journalists desperate to extract something actually interesting from statistically insignificant shifts in poll numbers.

Where did it come from?

It originated (and continues to this day) in sports coverage, where a team or player is deemed to benefit from the effects of a good run of results. First used in politics by George H W Bush after he won the Iowa caucuses in the 1980 Republican presidential primaries. After his win, Bush Senior said, “Now they will be after me, howling and yowling at my heels. What we will have is momentum. We will look forward to Big Mo being on our side, as they say in athletics.” He lost to Ronald Reagan.

Does momentum really exist?

Nate Silver, the most respected electoral analyst in the US, says no. “In general elections, the direction in which polls have moved is not predictive of the direction in which they will move,” he wrote in 2010.

“Thus, it is usually wrong to say that a candidate is gaining ground in the polls – present tense – or that her position is improving. Instead, you should say that the candidate has gained ground or that her position has improved.”

So it’s all a fairytale?

Yes. It’s often suggested that if successive polls in the run-up to an election show a party increasing its percentage, then that trend will continue upwards when the actual vote takes place. There is no empirical evidence that this is true.

So why do so many people in politics believe it?

Think of it as part of the natural human impulse to find structure and narrative in the meaningless void of existence. As Silver says: “We can look at a pretty chart, and see the lines converging toward one another: our brains tend to assume that they are eventually bound to cross. But at least as often, they do not. And a candidate’s ‘momentum’ proves to be ephemeral.”

Will we hear it much in this election?

Undoubtedly.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.