How volunteer lawyers joined quest for Magdalene justice
Some argue that work of that nature should not have relied on volunteerism
Magdalene survivors Marina Gambold (left) and Maureen Sullivan after meeting with Enda Kenny last year. In order to deliver his report, Mr Justice John Quirke was assisted by 33 barristers who, over five weeks, talked to the 337 Magdalene survivors. photograph: bryan o’brien
In April last year they began making the first tentative phone calls. Hundreds of women with the same and yet infinitely different experiences answered to tell their stories, share their concerns, say what they needed.
There was a sense that history was being made or put to rest but above all, belated justice-in-action on a scale never before seen.
In order to deliver his Magdalene Commission Report, Mr Justice John Quirke was assisted by 33 barristers who, over five weeks, began to talk to the 337 Magdalene survivors who wished to participate in a process designed to address the issue of compensation.
- ‘This is about the kind of country Ireland was where women were the focus of shame’
- Minister writes to Magdalene nuns for third time seeking contribution to redress scheme
- A public inquiry is now essential to establish facts of Tuam mother and baby home
- Asylum delays causing undue hardship, says rights body
It was the largest pro-bono project ever conducted by the Bar Council of Ireland and while there was nothing in the way of litigation as it was a non-adversarial process, the barristers - who had to be women - were chosen because of their experience in dealing with sensitive cases and their professional approach to confidentiality.
The process itself appears organic; the women contacted were invited to talk and share at their own pace and to whatever degree they felt comfortable with.
Information gathered would shed invaluable light on their history, create a vital context toward the issue of compensation.
Yet some difficult questions arise about how all this was achieved.
“He [Mr Justice Quirke] felt it was very important to focus on the needs of the women themselves obviously but the only way in order to do that was to set up some sort of system through which their needs could be heard and voiced,” explains Tricia Sheehy Skeffington, one of the volunteer barristers.
“It was really about them, not what we wanted from them. We also wanted them to be able to voice the hurt that they had suffered; the abuse that they suffered but we weren’t engaging in any testing.
“We would listen and take on board the information where it was appropriate but we would have been guided by what the women needed from the conversation.”
VolunteersResources and time were limited. The barristers, who volunteered with the facilitation of Turlough O’Donnell SC, had to find pertinent information: what the women required, such as health needs, housing and pensions among others. They had worked for free in the laundries.
In his own report Mr Justice Quirke puts the process like this: “This conversation was intended to be both an information gathering process and, more importantly, an opportunity for the Magdalene women to convey directly to the commission and to me, who they were, where they were, what their circumstances were and what could be done to assist them and make their lives more comfortable.”
To reach this end, the barristers were provided with training from the Glencree Centre for Peace and Reconciliation in how to interact with the women and since the completion of the report, their testimonies have been destroyed. This was not a historical documentary exercise.