European law catching on to social media

Paul Lambert’s new book is a timely look at the legal and policy issues in Europe around social media usage

The challenges as a result of the rise in social media are arising faster than policy and law-makers can address. Paul Lambert’s new book on the area is a welcome contribution to  a much needed debate. Photo: Getty

The challenges as a result of the rise in social media are arising faster than policy and law-makers can address. Paul Lambert’s new book on the area is a welcome contribution to a much needed debate. Photo: Getty

Mon, Jun 23, 2014, 01:10

The growth of the internet industry in what is described as “Web 2.0” technologies was until recently seen as US-centric, and the law regulating this area was centred from that sphere. But this has changed, predominantly for two reasons:

Firstly, the expansion of these web 2.0 companies, particularly social media companies in Europe (and Ireland in particular), has meant the laws and policy of the European Union has become more and more relevant.

For example, AirBNB recently announced all of their non-US business would be conducted exclusively under Irish law. Whilst some US-based companies operating in Ireland continue to cite American jurisdiction for their non-advertising operations (Google being one such example) more and more social media companies, either wholly or partly, operate under civil and, in particular, criminal law across Europe via Ireland.

Secondly, the nature of these social media companies has meant the jurisdiction of their activities has not been so much about where they themselves are based, but where their users are based.

Social media account

Research published last week by Ipsos MRBI revealed three quarters of the Irish population over the age of 15 have a social media account, with almost two thirds (62 per cent) of Irish people active on Facebook, and 30 per cent active on Twitter.

On this basis, solicitor and law lecturer Paul Lambert’s new book Social Networking: Law, Rights and Policy is both a timely and relevant tome that looks not just at the legal and policy environment in Europe around social media usage, but at a number of contemporary issues concerning the use of social media by individuals and by companies.

Lambert, who has written worthwhile texts on data protection and the use of Twitter in the court room, has brought together a number of authors and contributors, including solicitors, academics, law students and social media advocacy groups with specialisms and experience across the range of contemporary legal and policy areas concerning social media.

The book covers a comprehensive range of areas, including data protection and social media, user-generated content and how the legal environment differs between publishers of original content and the content produced by users of social media, advertising and marketing on social media (in particular behavioural advertising targeted at users based on their use of social media and the internet, children and social media (with an important emphasis on online bullying) and privacy for users on social media – for example being “tagged”on social media networks.

One contributor whose input into the book is particularly worthwhile and relevant is Max Schrems, an Austrian law student and privacy campaigner who has challenged the Irish Data Protection Commissioner to investigate claims by Edward Snowden that Facebook breached EU data law by passing the data of EU users to the US National Security Agency as part of the agency’s Prism programme.

Alleged revelations

Just last week, the High Court decided to refer to the European Court of Justice key questions raised by Schrems’s challenge to the commissioner’s refusal to investigate his complaint about Facebook.

In the book, Schrems and his organisation, Europe Against Facebook, identify the key elements of their criticisms of Facebook with regard to European and Irish data protection laws. The complaints levelled at the social network include how it stores and retains data, the “shadowing” of data (collecting data unknown to a user), the tagging of users in photos and content without their permission, changes to privacy policies and Facebook’s facial recognition (which was acknowledged as being in breach of data protection laws).

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.