European law catching on to social media

Paul Lambert’s new book is a timely look at the legal and policy issues in Europe around social media usage

The challenges as a result of the rise in social media are arising faster than policy and law-makers can address. Paul Lambert’s new book on the area is a welcome contribution to  a much needed debate. Photo: Getty

The challenges as a result of the rise in social media are arising faster than policy and law-makers can address. Paul Lambert’s new book on the area is a welcome contribution to a much needed debate. Photo: Getty

Mon, Jun 23, 2014, 01:10

The growth of the internet industry in what is described as “Web 2.0” technologies was until recently seen as US-centric, and the law regulating this area was centred from that sphere. But this has changed, predominantly for two reasons:

Firstly, the expansion of these web 2.0 companies, particularly social media companies in Europe (and Ireland in particular), has meant the laws and policy of the European Union has become more and more relevant.

For example, AirBNB recently announced all of their non-US business would be conducted exclusively under Irish law. Whilst some US-based companies operating in Ireland continue to cite American jurisdiction for their non-advertising operations (Google being one such example) more and more social media companies, either wholly or partly, operate under civil and, in particular, criminal law across Europe via Ireland.

Secondly, the nature of these social media companies has meant the jurisdiction of their activities has not been so much about where they themselves are based, but where their users are based.

Social media account

Research published last week by Ipsos MRBI revealed three quarters of the Irish population over the age of 15 have a social media account, with almost two thirds (62 per cent) of Irish people active on Facebook, and 30 per cent active on Twitter.

On this basis, solicitor and law lecturer Paul Lambert’s new book Social Networking: Law, Rights and Policy is both a timely and relevant tome that looks not just at the legal and policy environment in Europe around social media usage, but at a number of contemporary issues concerning the use of social media by individuals and by companies.

Lambert, who has written worthwhile texts on data protection and the use of Twitter in the court room, has brought together a number of authors and contributors, including solicitors, academics, law students and social media advocacy groups with specialisms and experience across the range of contemporary legal and policy areas concerning social media.

The book covers a comprehensive range of areas, including data protection and social media, user-generated content and how the legal environment differs between publishers of original content and the content produced by users of social media, advertising and marketing on social media (in particular behavioural advertising targeted at users based on their use of social media and the internet, children and social media (with an important emphasis on online bullying) and privacy for users on social media – for example being “tagged”on social media networks.

One contributor whose input into the book is particularly worthwhile and relevant is Max Schrems, an Austrian law student and privacy campaigner who has challenged the Irish Data Protection Commissioner to investigate claims by Edward Snowden that Facebook breached EU data law by passing the data of EU users to the US National Security Agency as part of the agency’s Prism programme.

Alleged revelations

Just last week, the High Court decided to refer to the European Court of Justice key questions raised by Schrems’s challenge to the commissioner’s refusal to investigate his complaint about Facebook.

In the book, Schrems and his organisation, Europe Against Facebook, identify the key elements of their criticisms of Facebook with regard to European and Irish data protection laws. The complaints levelled at the social network include how it stores and retains data, the “shadowing” of data (collecting data unknown to a user), the tagging of users in photos and content without their permission, changes to privacy policies and Facebook’s facial recognition (which was acknowledged as being in breach of data protection laws).

Europe Against Facebook’s significant concerns about Facebook are lengthy, but no doubt thorough in nature, and, as Shrems himself admits, not exhaustive.

Shrems notes in Lambert’s book they wanted the Irish Data Protection Commissioner to look into how Facebook handles users’ data. The organisation’s criticism is not just directed at Facebook, but is just as critical of the failure of regulators to properly acknowledge these concerns.

Another particular issue, though straying more into search engines than pure social networking, is the issue of the right to be forgotten.

As with all the topics in the book, Lambert has seemingly sourced the most qualified and informed contributors to write about particular areas. The recent ruling by the European Court of Justice on the right to be forgotten follows a Spanish High Court ruling obliging search engines to accede to an individual’s request for specific search results to be removed if the results were “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant”.

Writing in Lambert’s text, Spanish law professor José M Baño Fos details the background to the original case, with a comprehensive analysis of the legal and policy landscape impacting on the case. As with many of the chapters, more questions are provided than answers, which helps to identify the policy and legal challenges facing companies and indeed citizens facing these issues in future.

Whilst much of the contemporary issues facing social media usage do involve a legal landscape, it’s interesting to see how examples can be provided of soft regulation of social media. An interesting take on this in Lambert’s book concerns the regulation of football players (both British and American) on social media.

Social media utterings

Gary Madden, an academic expert on the interface between law and sport, lays out a review of how the Football Association in England in effect regulates the speech of its players by measuring all of their social media utterings against the organisation’s code of conduct. Madden highlights how the regulation of a player’s activity on social media is measured against whether they bring the game in repute.

Madden critically assesses the FA’s performance against its own responsibilities with regard to accountability and self-regulation. Whilst it may not suggest a framework for how companies should establish social media policies, the chapter provides an interesting outline of how an organisation has tried to set out a social media guidelines.

There are significant challenges ahead when it comes to how social media is approached; this book is a timely and welcome contribution to that debate.

Given the focus of attention on Ireland in particular as a European tech hub, the legal challenges will substantially increase. No doubt this book will be a welcome resource for those responsible for charting out a future where these issues are dealt with.

Social Networking: Law, Rights and Policy is published by Clarus Press, priced at €99. David Cochrane is Communities Editor with The Irish Times, and a postgraduate student studying Intellectual Property & Information Technology Law at University College Dublin.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Sign Up

The name that will appear beside your comments.

Have an account? Sign In

Forgot Password?

Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In or Sign Up

Thank you

You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Hello, .

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to verify your account.

We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.