Limerick regeneration plan aims to reverse decades of decline
‘Limerick 2030’ claims to have potential to deliver 12,000 new jobs
After a very shaky start, Limerick should be en fête for much of this year as Ireland’s first National City of Culture. Bedevilled by organisational chaos, it’s being done on a shoestring, with €6 million in Government funding, but is still expected to generate €100 million for the local economy.
Limerick is aiming, so its latest plan says, to become “a major economic force in the Irish and European economy”. Whatever about the Irish context, it would require a significant leap of faith to imagine that the midwest’s capital (population: 91,500) will soon be taking on the likes of Lubeck or Livorno.
But there are some who believe Limerick 2030: an Economic and Spatial Plan for Limerick may be the most comprehensive since Edmund Sexton Pery began laying out his Georgian “new town” in the 1760s, and that its vision of turning Limerick into “Ireland’s most business-friendly city” might even be achievable.
- Limerick regeneration plan aims to reverse decades of decline
- ‘If you don’t have a strong city all of Limerick suffers’
- Culture strategy: civic spaces, a funded theatre group and arthouse cinema
- Most Georgian properties in use but condition varies
- Darren Shan: My favourite place in Limerick is Donkey Ford’s fish and chip shop
- Local elections will be keenly contested in new Limerick council constituency
The plan, drawn up by a consortium of consultants led by GVA Grimley for €190,000, “has the potential to deliver 12,000 new jobs and sets out a number of objectives which will considerably change the infrastructure of the city centre and deliver a whole new vision for Limerick as a leading centre for commercial investment”.
As its authors concede, Limerick has been in decline as a commercial centre over the last 10 to 20 years. “This decline is most evident in the city centre, which has been undermined by competition from out-of-centre development – both shopping and business development and by an imbalance in business rates between city and county.”
Across Ireland, as Limerick 2030 says bluntly, “the midwest has been the worst-performing region in terms of change in the number of IDA-supported jobs between 2006 and 2010. For the midwest, the number of jobs has declined by 38.5 per cent compared to a decline of 9.5 per cent for Ireland as a whole.”
Limerick was hit harder than most because most of its foreign direct investment was in IT manufacturing, notably by Dell, rather than in more resilient computer software, research and development. Unfortunately, it banked on an industry that has “constantly shifted to lower-cost locations”.
What the latest plan sets out to do is to “capture elements of economic sectors which are clustering elsewhere” – just as social media firms Google, Facebook and others have congregated in Dublin. But potential investors would need to be “overwhelmed by the quality of service and support that the city provides”.
‘No silver bullet’
The plan rightly focuses on improving the city centre as Limerick’s “shop window” and developing its role as “a place of creativity, culture and consumption”.
It concedes that there is “no ‘silver bullet’, no single initiative that will transform the city centre” and that success will require “clarity of vision” and implementation.
Such “clarity of vision” was absent in the past when Limerick County Council was granting permission for shopping centres on the outskirts of the city. Though the county and city are now being merged, this legacy will make it difficult to achieve a key objective: “to reposition the city centre as the premier regional shopping destination”.
One of the plan’s most controversial proposals would involve redeveloping Arthur’s Quay shopping mall and extending it to incorporate part of the public park along the quayside – an award-winning scheme from Limerick’s earlier phase of urban renewal that has since become a focus for antisocial activities.
The loss of public space would be offset by demolishing Sarsfield House, a hideous office block from the 1970s occupied by the Revenue that also obscures views of King’s Island. But this park extension proposal is critically dependent on new office space being provided for the Revenue on the fallow “Opera site” nearby.